| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Biophys J, August 1998, p. 755-768, Vol. 75, No. 2
*Department of Chemical Engineering and Center for Molecular and Engineering Thermodynamics, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716, and #Department of Chemical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218 USA
We consider whether the continuum model of hydration
optimized to reproduce vacuum-to-water transfer free energies
simultaneously describes the hydration free energy contributions to
conformational equilibria of the same solutes in water. To this end,
transfer and conformational free energies of idealized hydrophobic and amphiphilic solutes in water are calculated from explicit water simulations and compared to continuum model predictions. As benchmark hydrophobic solutes, we examine the hydration of linear alkanes from
methane through hexane. Amphiphilic solutes were created by adding a
charge of ±1e to a terminal methyl group of butane. We
find that phenomenological continuum parameters fit to transfer free
energies are significantly different from those fit to conformational free energies of our model solutes. This difference is attributed to
continuum model parameters that depend on solute conformation in water,
and leads to effective values for the free energy/surface area
coefficient and Born radii that best describe conformational equilibrium. In light of these results, we believe that continuum models of hydration optimized to fit transfer free energies do not
accurately capture the balance between hydrophobic and electrostatic contributions that determines the solute conformational state in
aqueous solution.
Biophys J, August 1998, p. 755-768, Vol. 75, No. 2
© 1998 by the Biophysical Society 0006-3495/98/08/755/14 $2.00
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |