| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Biophys J, March 1999, p. 1367-1376, Vol. 76, No. 3
*Department of Chemistry and Biophysics Program at the University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 USA, and #UMR 6522 CNRS-University of Rouen (IFRMP 23), 76821 Mont Saint Aignan, France
Alamethicin is a helical 20-amino acid voltage-gated
channel-forming peptide, which is known to exhibit segmental
flexibility in solution along its backbone near
-methylalanine
(MeA)-10 and Gly-11. In an
-helical configuration, MeA at position
10 would normally hydrogen-bond with position 14, but the presence of
proline at this position prevents the formation of this interhelical
hydrogen bond. To determine whether the presence of proline at position 14 contributes to the flexibility of this helix, two analogs of alamethicin were synthesized, one with proline 14 replaced by alanine
and another with both proline 14 and glycine 11 replaced by alanine.
The C-termini of these peptides were derivatized with a proxyl
nitroxide, and paramagnetic enhancements produced by the nitroxide on
the C
protons were used to estimate
r
6 weighted distances between the
nitroxide and the backbone protons. When compared to native
alamethicin, the analog lacking proline 14 exhibited similar C-terminal
to C
proton distances, indicating that substitution of proline alone
does not alter the flexibility of this helix; however, the subsequent
removal of glycine 11 resulted in a significant increase in the
averaged distances between the C- and N-termini. Thus, the G-X-X-P
motif found in alamethicin appears to be largely responsible for
mediating high-amplitude bending motions that have been observed in the
central helical domain of alamethicin in methanol. To determine whether
these substitutions alter the channel behavior of alamethicin, the
macroscopic and single-channel currents produced by these analogs were
compared. Although the substitution of the G-X-X-P motif produces
channels with altered characteristics, this motif is not essential to
achieve voltage-dependent gating or alamethicin-like behavior.
Biophys J, March 1999, p. 1367-1376, Vol. 76, No. 3
© 1999 by the Biophysical Society 0006-3495/99/03/1367/10 $2.00
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Duclohier, G. M. Alder, C. L. Bashford, H. Bruckner, J. K. Chugh, and B. A. Wallace Conductance Studies on Trichotoxin_A50E and Implications for Channel Structure Biophys. J., September 1, 2004; 87(3): 1705 - 1710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. O. Shenkarev, T. A. Balashova, Z. A. Yakimenko, T. V. Ovchinnikova, and A. S. Arseniev Peptaibol Zervamicin IIB Structure and Dynamics Refinement from Transhydrogen Bond J Couplings Biophys. J., June 1, 2004; 86(6): 3687 - 3699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |