| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Biophys J, June 1999, p. 2951-2965, Vol. 76, No. 6
*Frumkin Institute of Electrochemistry, Moscow, Russia; #Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Biophysics, National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 USA, and §Department of Molecular Biophysics and Physiology, Rush Medical College, Chicago, Illinois 60612 USA
When two membranes fuse, their components mix; this is
usually described as a purely diffusional process. However, if the membranes are under different tensions, the material will spread predominantly by convection. We use standard fluid mechanics to rigorously calculate the steady-state convective flux of lipids. A
fusion pore is modeled as a toroid shape, connecting two planar membranes. Each of the membrane monolayers is considered separately as
incompressible viscous media with the same shear viscosity,
s. The two monolayers interact by sliding past each
other, described by an intermonolayer viscosity,
r.
Combining a continuity equation with an equation that balances the work
provided by the tension difference, 
, against the energy
dissipated by flow in the viscous membrane, yields expressions for
lipid velocity,
, and area of lipid flux,
. These expressions for
and
depend on 
,
s,
r, and
geometrical aspects of a toroidal pore, but the general features of the
theory hold for any fusion pore that has a roughly hourglass shape.
These expressions are readily applicable to data from any experiments
that monitor movement of lipid dye between fused membranes under
different tensions. Lipid velocity increases nonlinearly from a small
value for small pore radii, rp, to a saturating
value at large rp. As a result of velocity
saturation, the flux increases linearly with pore radius for large
pores. The calculated lipid flux is in agreement with available
experimental data for both large and transient fusion pores.
Biophys J, June 1999, p. 2951-2965, Vol. 76, No. 6
© 1999 by the Biophysical Society 0006-3495/99/06/2951/15 $2.00
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. K. den Otter and S. A. Shkulipa Intermonolayer Friction and Surface Shear Viscosity of Lipid Bilayer Membranes Biophys. J., July 15, 2007; 93(2): 423 - 433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Shkulipa, W. K. den Otter, and W. J. Briels Surface Viscosity, Diffusion, and Intermonolayer Friction: Simulating Sheared Amphiphilic Bilayers Biophys. J., August 1, 2005; 89(2): 823 - 829. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Upadhyaya and M. P. Sheetz Tension in Tubulovesicular Networks of Golgi and Endoplasmic Reticulum Membranes Biophys. J., May 1, 2004; 86(5): 2923 - 2928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Sombers, H. J. Hanchar, T. L. Colliver, N. Wittenberg, A. Cans, S. Arbault, C. Amatore, and A. G. Ewing The Effects of Vesicular Volume on Secretion through the Fusion Pore in Exocytotic Release from PC12 Cells J. Neurosci., January 14, 2004; 24(2): 303 - 309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |