help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Falk, S.
Right arrow Articles by Berteloot, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Falk, S.
Right arrow Articles by Berteloot, A.

Biophys J, July 1999, p. 173-188, Vol. 77, No. 1

Kinetic Mechanisms of Inhibitor Binding: Relevance to the Fast-Acting Slow-Binding Paradigm

Said Falk, Nathalie Oulianova, and Alfred Berteloot

Membrane Transport Research Group, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, CP 6128, succursale Centre-Ville, Montreal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada.

Although phlorizin inhibition of Na+-glucose cotransport occurs within a few seconds, 3H-phlorizin binding to the sodium-coupled glucose transport protein(s) requires several minutes to reach equilibrium (the fast-acting slow-binding paradigm). Using kinetic models of arbitrary dimension that can be reduced to a two-state diagram according to Cha's formalism, we show that three basic mechanisms of inhibitor binding can be identified whereby the inhibitor binding step either (A) represents, (B) precedes, or (C) follows the rate-limiting step in a binding reaction. We demonstrate that each of mechanisms A-C is associated with a set of unique kinetic properties, and that the time scale over which one may expect to observe mechanism C is conditioned by the turnover number of the catalytic cycle. In contrast, mechanisms A and B may be relevant to either fast-acting or slow-binding inhibitors. However, slow-binding inhibition according to mechanism A may not be compatible with a fast-acting behavior on the steady-state time scale of a few seconds. We conclude that the recruitment hypothesis (mechanism C) cannot account for slow phlorizin binding to the sodium-coupled glucose transport protein(s), and that mechanism B is the only alternative that may explain the fast-acting slow-binding paradigm.

Biophys J, July 1999, p. 173-188, Vol. 77, No. 1
© 1999 by the Biophysical Society   0006-3495/99/07/173/16  $2.00



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
D. G. Gagnon, C. Frindel, and J.-Y. Lapointe
Effect of Substrate on the Pre-Steady-State Kinetics of the Na+/Glucose Cotransporter
Biophys. J., January 15, 2007; 92(2): 461 - 472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the Biophysical Society.