| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Biophys J, July 1999, p. 386-397, Vol. 77, No. 1
*Department of Physiology and Pennsylvania Muscle Institute, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6083 and #Department of Pathology, Anatomy and Cell Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107 USA
When smooth muscle myosin subfragment 1 (S1) is bound to
actin filaments in vitro, the light chain domain tilts upon release of
MgADP, producing a ~3.5-nm axial motion of the head-rod junction (Whittaker et al., 1995. Nature. 378:748-751). If this
motion contributes significantly to the power stroke, rigor tension of smooth muscle should decrease substantially in response to cross-bridge binding of MgADP. To test this prediction, we monitored mechanical properties of permeabilized strips of chicken gizzard muscle in rigor
and in the presence of MgADP. For comparison, we also tested psoas and
soleus muscle fibers. Any residual bound ADP was minimized by
incubation in Mg2+-free rigor solution containing 15 mM
EDTA. The addition of 2 mM MgADP, while keeping ionic strength and free
Mg2+ concentration constant, resulted in a slight increase
in rigor tension in both gizzard and soleus muscles, but a decrease in psoas muscle. In-phase stiffness monitored during small (<0.1%) 500-Hz sinusoidal length oscillations decreased in all three muscle types when MgADP was added. The changes in force and stiffness with the
addition of MgADP were similar at ionic strengths from 50 to 200 mM and
were reversible. The results with gizzard muscle were similar after
thiophosphorylation of the regulatory light chain of myosin. These
results suggest that the axial motion of smooth muscle S1 bound to
actin, upon dissociation of MgADP, is not associated with force
generation. The difference between the present mechanical data and
previous structural studies of smooth S1 may be explained if
geometrical constraints of the intact contractile filament array alter
the motions of the myosin heads.
Biophys J, July 1999, p. 386-397, Vol. 77, No. 1
© 1999 by the Biophysical Society 0006-3495/99/07/386/12 $2.00
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. S. Khromov, M. R. Webb, M. A. Ferenczi, D. R. Trentham, A. P. Somlyo, and A. V. Somlyo Myosin Regulatory Light Chain Phosphorylation and Strain Modulate Adenosine Diphosphate Release from Smooth Muscle Myosin Biophys. J., April 1, 2004; 86(4): 2318 - 2328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Baker, C. Brosseau, P. Fagnant, and D. M. Warshaw The Unique Properties of Tonic Smooth Muscle Emerge from Intrinsic as Well as Intermolecular Behaviors of Myosin Molecules J. Biol. Chem., August 1, 2003; 278(31): 28533 - 28539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Ellison, Z. S. DePew, and C. R. Cremo Both Heads of Tissue-derived Smooth Muscle Heavy Meromyosin Bind to Actin in the Presence of ADP J. Biol. Chem., February 7, 2003; 278(7): 4410 - 4415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Reedy Visualizing myosin's power stroke in muscle contraction J. Cell Sci., January 10, 2000; 113(20): 3551 - 3562. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Rosenfeld, J. Xing, M. Whitaker, H. C. Cheung, F. Brown, A. Wells, R. A. Milligan, and H. L. Sweeney Kinetic and Spectroscopic Evidence for Three Actomyosin:ADP States in Smooth Muscle J. Biol. Chem., August 11, 2000; 275(33): 25418 - 25426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |