| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Biophys J, August 1999, p. 739-746, Vol. 77, No. 2
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pharmacology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261 USA
Although it plays no clinical role in general anesthesia,
gramicidin A, a transmembrane channel peptide, provides an excellent model for studying the specific interaction between volatile
anesthetics and membrane proteins at the molecular level. We show here
that a pair of structurally similar volatile anesthetic and
nonimmobilizer (nonanesthetic), 1-chloro-1,2,2-trifluorocyclobutane
(F3) and 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane (F6), respectively,
interacts differently with the transmembrane peptide. With 400 µM
gramicidin A in a vesicle suspension of 60 mM
phosphatidylcholine-phosphatidylglycerol (PC/PG), the intermolecular
cross-relaxation rate constants between 19F of F3 and
1H in the chemical shift regions for the indole and
backbone amide protons were 0.0106 ± 0.0007 (n = 12) and 0.0105 ± 0.0014 (n = 8) s
1, respectively. No
cross-relaxation was measurable between 19F of F6 and
protons in these regions. Sodium transport study showed that with 75 µM gramicidin A in a vesicle suspension of 66 mM PC/PG, F3 increased
the 23Na apparent efflux rate constant from 149.7 ± 7.2 of control (n = 3) to 191.7 ± 12.2 s
1 (n = 3), and the apparent influx
rate constant from 182.1 ± 15.4 to 222.8 ± 21.7 s
1 (n = 3). In contrast, F6 had no
effects on either influx or efflux rate. It is concluded that the
ability of general anesthetics to interact with amphipathic residues
near the peptide-lipid-water interface and the inability of
nonimmobilizer to do the same may represent some characteristics of
anesthetic-protein interaction that are of importance to general anesthesia.
Biophys J, August 1999, p. 739-746, Vol. 77, No. 2
© 1999 by the Biophysical Society 0006-3495/99/08/739/08 $2.00
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Lynch III Meyer and Overton Revisited Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2008; 107(3): 864 - 867. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Ma, N. R. Brandon, T. Cui, V. Bondarenko, C. Canlas, J. S. Johansson, P. Tang, and Y. Xu Four-{alpha}-Helix Bundle with Designed Anesthetic Binding Pockets. Part I: Structural and Dynamical Analyses Biophys. J., June 1, 2008; 94(11): 4454 - 4463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Bondarenko, V. E. Yushmanov, Y. Xu, and P. Tang NMR Study of General Anesthetic Interaction with nAChR {beta}2 Subunit Biophys. J., March 1, 2008; 94(5): 1681 - 1688. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Liu, Y. Xu, and P. Tang Molecular Dynamics Simulations of C2F6 Effects on Gramicidin A: Implications of the Mechanisms of General Anesthesia Biophys. J., June 1, 2005; 88(6): 3784 - 3791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Streiff, N. O. Juranic, S. I. Macura, D. O. Warner, K. A. Jones, and W. J. Perkins Saturation Transfer Difference Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy As a Method for Screening Proteins for Anesthetic Binding Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2004; 66(4): 929 - 935. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Tang and Y. Xu From the Cover: Large-scale molecular dynamics simulations of general anesthetic effects on the ion channel in the fully hydrated membrane: The implication of molecular mechanisms of general anesthesia PNAS, December 10, 2002; 99(25): 16035 - 16040. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Tang, P. K. Mandal, and M. Zegarra Effects of Volatile Anesthetic on Channel Structure of Gramicidin A Biophys. J., September 1, 2002; 83(3): 1413 - 1420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Trudell and E. Bertaccini Molecular modelling of specific and non-specific anaesthetic interactions Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2002; 89(1): 32 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Tang, P. K. Mandal, and Y. Xu NMR Structures of the Second Transmembrane Domain of the Human Glycine Receptor alpha 1 Subunit: Model of Pore Architecture and Channel Gating Biophys. J., July 1, 2002; 83(1): 252 - 262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |