| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Biophys J, November 1999, p. 2411-2417, Vol. 77, No. 5
*Department of Biology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061 USA; #5 Barrymore Road, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755 USA; and §Department of Agricultural Chemical Technology, Technical University, Budapest 1521, Hungary
Many organisms display rhythms of physiology and behavior
that are entrained to the 24-h cycle of light and darkness prevailing on Earth. Under constant conditions of illumination and temperature, these internal biological rhythms persist with a period close to 1 day
("circadian"), but it is usually not exactly 24 h. Recent discoveries have uncovered stunning similarities among the molecular circuitries of circadian clocks in mice, fruit flies, and bread molds.
A consensus picture is coming into focus around two proteins (called
PER and TIM in fruit flies), which dimerize and then inhibit transcription of their own genes. Although this picture seems to
confirm a venerable model of circadian rhythms based on time-delayed negative feedback, we suggest that just as crucial to the circadian oscillator is a positive feedback loop based on stabilization of PER
upon dimerization. These ideas can be expressed in simple mathematical
form (phase plane portraits), and the model accounts naturally for
several hallmarks of circadian rhythms, including temperature
compensation and the perL mutant phenotype.
In addition, the model suggests how an endogenous circadian oscillator
could have evolved from a more primitive, light-activated switch.
Biophys J, November 1999, p. 2411-2417, Vol. 77, No. 5
© 1999 by the Biophysical Society 0006-3495/99/11/2411/07 $2.00
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. R. Taylor, F. J. Doyle 3rd, and L. R. Petzold Oscillator Model Reduction Preserving the Phase Response: Application to the Circadian Clock Biophys. J., August 15, 2008; 95(4): 1658 - 1673. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Li and X. Lang Internal Noise-Sustained Circadian Rhythms in a Drosophila Model Biophys. J., March 15, 2008; 94(6): 1983 - 1994. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Gunawan and F. J. Doyle III Isochron-Based Phase Response Analysis of Circadian Rhythms Biophys. J., September 15, 2006; 91(6): 2131 - 2141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Indic, K. Gurdziel, R. E. Kronauer, and E. B. Klerman Development of a Two-Dimension Manifold to Represent High Dimension Mathematical Models of the Intracellular Mammalian Circadian Clock. J Biol Rhythms, June 1, 2006; 21(3): 222 - 232. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Francois A Model for the Neurospora Circadian Clock Biophys. J., April 1, 2005; 88(4): 2369 - 2383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Becker-Weimann, J. Wolf, H. Herzel, and A. Kramer Modeling Feedback Loops of the Mammalian Circadian Oscillator Biophys. J., November 1, 2004; 87(5): 3023 - 3034. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Smolen, D. A. Baxter, and J. H. Byrne A Reduced Model Clarifies the Role of Feedback Loops and Time Delays in the Drosophila Circadian Oscillator Biophys. J., November 1, 2002; 83(5): 2349 - 2359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. McMillen, N. Kopell, J. Hasty, and J. J. Collins Synchronizing genetic relaxation oscillators by intercell signaling PNAS, January 22, 2002; 99(2): 679 - 684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Smolen, D. A. Baxter, and J. H. Byrne Modeling Circadian Oscillations with Interlocking Positive and Negative Feedback Loops J. Neurosci., September 1, 2001; 21(17): 6644 - 6656. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |