| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Biophys J, December 1999, p. 3256-3276, Vol. 77, No. 6
*Department of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-1700, and #Department of Chemistry, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
Using a site-specific, Electron Paramagnetic Resonance
(EPR)-active spin probe that is more rigidly locked to the DNA than any
previously reported, the internal dynamics of duplex DNAs in solution
were studied. EPR spectra of linear duplex DNAs containing 14-100 base
pairs were acquired and simulated by the stochastic Liouville equation
for anisotropic rotational diffusion using the diffusion tensor for a
right circular cylinder. Internal motions have previously been assumed
to be on a rapid enough time scale that they caused an averaging of the
spin interactions. This assumption, however, was found to be
inconsistent with the experimental data. The weakly bending rod model
is modified to take into account the finite relaxation times of the
internal modes and applied to analyze the EPR spectra. With this
modification, the dependence of the oscillation amplitude of the probe
on position along the DNA was in good agreement with the predictions of
the weakly bending rod theory. From the length and position dependence
of the internal flexibility of the DNA, a submicrosecond dynamic
bending persistence length of around 1500 to 1700 Å was found.
Schellman and Harvey (Biophys. Chem. 55:95-114, 1995) have estimated
that, out of the total persistence length of duplex DNA, believed to be
about 500 Å, approximately 1500 Å is accounted for by static bends
and 750 Å by fluctuating bends. A measured dynamic persistence length of around 1500 Å leads to the suggestion that there are additional conformations of the DNA that relax on a longer time scale than that
accessible by linear CW-EPR. These measurements are the first direct
determination of the dynamic flexibility of duplex DNA in 0.1 M salt.
Biophys J, December 1999, p. 3256-3276, Vol. 77, No. 6
© 1999 by the Biophysical Society 0006-3495/99/12/3256/21 $2.00
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Cekan, A. L. Smith, N. Barhate, B. H. Robinson, and S. Th. Sigurdsson Rigid spin-labeled nucleoside C: a nonperturbing EPR probe of nucleic acid conformation Nucleic Acids Res., October 1, 2008; 36(18): 5946 - 5954. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Mazur Evaluation of Elastic Properties of Atomistic DNA Models Biophys. J., December 15, 2006; 91(12): 4507 - 4518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. S. Fujimoto, G. P. Brewood, and J. M. Schurr Torsional Rigidities of Weakly Strained DNAs Biophys. J., December 1, 2006; 91(11): 4166 - 4179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Sakamoto, A. Mahara, K. Yamagata, R. Iwase, T. Yamaoka, and A. Murakami Evaluation of Dynamic Features of Escherichia coli 16S Ribosomal RNA in Homogeneous Physiological Solution Biophys. J., December 1, 2005; 89(6): 4122 - 4128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Somoza, D. Andreatta, C. J. Murphy, R. S. Coleman, and M. A. Berg Effect of lesions on the dynamics of DNA on the picosecond and nanosecond timescales using a polarity sensitive probe Nucleic Acids Res., May 6, 2004; 32(8): 2494 - 2507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Okonogi, S. C. Alley, A. W. Reese, P. B. Hopkins, and B. H. Robinson Sequence-Dependent Dynamics of Duplex DNA: The Applicability of a Dinucleotide Model Biophys. J., December 1, 2002; 83(6): 3446 - 3459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Okonogi, S. C. Alley, E. A. Harwood, P. B. Hopkins, and B. H. Robinson Phosphate backbone neutralization increases duplex DNA flexibility: A model for protein binding PNAS, April 2, 2002; 99(7): 4156 - 4160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Wu, K. M. Parkhurst, R. M. Powell, M. Brenowitz, and L. J. Parkhurst DNA Bends in TATA-binding Protein{middle dot}TATA Complexes in Solution Are DNA Sequence-dependent J. Biol. Chem., April 27, 2001; 276(18): 14614 - 14622. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |