help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Allison, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Stigter, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Allison, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Stigter, D.

Biophys J, January 2000, p. 121-124, Vol. 78, No. 1

A Commentary on the Screened-Oseen, Counterion-Condensation Formalism of Polyion Electrophoresis

Stuart A. Allison* and Dirk Stigterdagger

 *Department of Chemistry, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30303 and  dagger Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143, USA

The use of linear theory, in particular, counterion condensation (CC) theory, in describing electrophoresis of polyelectrolyte chains, is criticized on several grounds. First, there are problems with CC theory in describing the equilibrium distribution of ions around polyelectrolytes. Second, CC theory is used to treat ion relaxation in a linear theory with respect to the polyion charge despite the fact that ion relaxation arises as a consequence of nonlinear charge effects. This nonlinearity has been well established by several investigators over the last 70 years for spherical, cylindrical, and arbitrarily shaped model polyions. Third, current use of CC theory ignores the electrophoretic hindrance as well as the ion relaxation for condensed counterions and only includes such interactions for uncondensed counterions. Because most of the condensed counterions lie outside the shear surface of the polyion (in the example of DNA), the assumption of ion condensation is artificial and unphysical. Fourth, the singular solution, based on a screened Oseen tensor, currently used in the above mentioned theories is simply wrong and fails to account for the incompressibility of the solvent. The actual singular solution, which has long been available, is discussed. In conclusion, it is pointed out that numerical alternatives based on classic electrophoresis theory (J.T.G. Overbeek, Kolloid-Beih, 1943, 54:287-364) are now available.

Biophys J, January 2000, p. 121-124, Vol. 78, No. 1
© 2000 by the Biophysical Society   0006-3495/00/01/121/04  $2.00


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Biophys. JHome page
M. Castelnovo and S. Grauwin
Electrophoresis of Positioned Nucleosomes
Biophys. J., May 1, 2007; 92(9): 3022 - 3031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Biophysical Society.