| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Biophys J, March 2000, p. 1126-1144, Vol. 78, No. 3
Physics Department, City College of New York, New York 10031
Asymmetry in packing the peptide amide dipole results in
larger positive than negative regions in proteins of all folding motifs. The average side chain potential in 305 proteins is 109 ± 30 mV (2.5 ± 0.7 kcal/mol/e). Because the backbone has zero net
charge, the non-zero potential is unexpected. The larger oxygen at the
negative and smaller proton at the positive end of the amide dipole
yield positive potentials because: 1) at allowed phi and psi angles
residues come off the backbone into the positive end of their own amide
dipole, avoiding the large oxygen; and 2) amide dipoles with their
carbonyl oxygen surface exposed and amine proton buried make the
protein interior more positive. Twice as many amides have their oxygens
exposed than their amine protons. The distribution of acidic and basic
residues shows the importance of the bias toward positive backbone
potentials. Thirty percent of the Asp, Glu, Lys, and Arg are buried.
Sixty percent of buried residues are acids, only 40% bases. The
positive backbone potential stabilizes ionization of 20% of the acids
by >3 pH units (
4.1 kcal/mol). Only 6.5% of the bases are
equivalently stabilized by negative regions. The backbone stabilizes
bound anions such as phosphates and rarely stabilizes bound cations.
Biophys J, March 2000, p. 1126-1144, Vol. 78, No. 3
© 2000 by the Biophysical Society 0006-3495/00/03/1126/19 $2.00
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Broomand, F. Osterberg, T. Wardi, and F. Elinder Electrostatic Domino Effect in the Shaker K Channel Turret Biophys. J., October 1, 2007; 93(7): 2307 - 2314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sotomayor, V. Vasquez, E. Perozo, and K. Schulten Ion Conduction through MscS as Determined by Electrophysiology and Simulation Biophys. J., February 1, 2007; 92(3): 886 - 902. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. H. Haas and C. R. D. Lancaster Calculated Coupling of Transmembrane Electron and Proton Transfer in Dihemic Quinol:Fumarate Reductase Biophys. J., December 1, 2004; 87(6): 4298 - 4315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Dolan, R. B. Yelle, B. W. Beck, J. T. Fischer, and T. Ichiye Protein Control of Electron Transfer Rates via Polarization: Molecular Dynamics Studies of Rubredoxin Biophys. J., April 1, 2004; 86(4): 2030 - 2036. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. E. Georgescu, E. G. Alexov, and M. R. Gunner Combining Conformational Flexibility and Continuum Electrostatics for Calculating pKas in Proteins Biophys. J., October 1, 2002; 83(4): 1731 - 1748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Zachariae, A. Koumanov, H. Engelhardt, and A. Karshikoff Electrostatic properties of the anion selective porin Omp32 from Delftia acidovorans and of the arginine cluster of bacterial porins Protein Sci., June 1, 2002; 11(6): 1309 - 1319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |