help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosen, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Dill, K. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosen, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Dill, K. A.

Biophys J, December 2000, p. 2818-2824, Vol. 79, No. 6

A Method for Parameter Optimization in Computational Biology

J. B. Rosen,* A. T. Phillips,dagger S. Y. Oh,Dagger and K. A. Dill§

 *Computer Science and Engineering Department, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, California 92093 USA;  dagger Department of Computer Science, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Eau Claire, Wisconsin 54702 USA;  Dagger Department of Mathematics, Chungnam National University, Taejon 305-764, Korea; and  §Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94118 USA

Models in computational biology, such as those used in binding, docking, and folding, are often empirical and have adjustable parameters. Because few of these models are yet fully predictive, the problem may be nonoptimal choices of parameters. We describe an algorithm called ENPOP (energy function parameter optimization) that improves---and sometimes optimizes---the parameters for any given model and for any given search strategy that identifies the stable state of that model. ENPOP iteratively adjusts the parameters simultaneously to move the model global minimum energy conformation for each of m different molecules as close as possible to the true native conformations, based on some appropriate measure of structural error. A proof of principle is given for two very different test problems. The first involves three different two-dimensional model protein molecules having 12 to 37 monomers and four parameters in common. The parameters converge to the values used to design the model native structures. The second problem involves nine bumpy landscapes, each having between 4 and 12 degrees of freedom. For the three adjustable parameters, the globally optimal values are known in advance. ENPOP converges quickly to the correct parameter set.

Biophys J, December 2000, p. 2818-2824, Vol. 79, No. 6
© 2000 by the Biophysical Society   0006-3495/00/12/2818/07  $2.00






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Biophysical Society.