help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Biophysical Journal 8: 1119-1130 (1968)
© 1968 the Biophysical Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Day, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Deering, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Day, R. S., III
Right arrow Articles by Deering, R. A.

Recovery of Colony-Forming Ability and Genetic Marker Activity by UV-Damaged Hemophilus influenzae

Rufus S. Day, III and R. A. Deering

ABSTRACT

The rate of recovery of UV-irradiated Hemophilus influenzae from acriflavine-sensitized loss of colony-forming ability was studied at various acriflavine concentrations, UV doses, and temperatures. This rate (as calculated from an equation based upon certain assumptions) was on the order of 0.07 per minute per cell at 37°C. This did not vary greatly with UV dose or acriflavine concentration, but did with temperature, giving a {Delta}H{ddagger} of about 16 kcal/mole. In another set of experiments, cells bearing two genetic markers (resistance to 2000 µg/ml streptomycin and to 2.5 µg/ml novobiocin) were irradiated and then incubated without acriflavine. DNA extracts made from samples taken after various periods of incubation time were assayed on antibiotic-sensitive cells using acriflavine to inhibit repair during and following transformation. It was found that both in vivo irradiated markers were reactivated in the donor to approximately the same extent (with a rate constant of 0.04 per minute). This result was in contrast to the results obtained when extracted DNA bearing the same markers was irradiated in vitro and used to transform cells. In this latter case the streptomycin marker was much more sensitive than the novobiocin marker. This difference is interpreted as being due to the mechanics of the transformation system.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1968 by the Biophysical Society.