| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Biophys J, February 2001, p. 606-612, Vol. 80, No. 2
and
*Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of New
Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131;
Program in Applied
Mathematics, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721; and
Theoretical Biology and Biophysics Group, Theoretical
Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico
87545 USA
The serial engagement model provides an attractive and
plausible explanation for how a typical antigen presenting cell,
exhibiting a low density of peptides recognized by a T cell, can
initiate T cell responses. If a single peptide displayed by a major
histocompatibility complex (MHC) can bind, sequentially, to different T
cell receptors (TCR), then a few peptides can activate many receptors.
To date, arguments supporting and questioning the prevalence of serial engagement have centered on the down-regulation of TCR after contact of
T cells with antigen presenting cells. Recently, the existence of
serial engagement has been challenged by the demonstration that
engagement of TCR can down-regulate nonengaged bystander TCR. Here we
show that for binding and dissociation rates that characterize
interactions between T cell receptors and peptide-MHC, substantial
serial engagement occurs. The result is independent of mechanisms and
measurements of receptor down-regulation. The conclusion that single
peptide-MHC engage many TCR, before diffusing out of the contact region
between the antigen-presenting cell and the T cell, is based on a
general first passage time calculation for a particle alternating
between states in which different diffusion coefficients govern its transport.
Biophys J, February 2001, p. 606-612, Vol. 80, No. 2
© 2001 by the Biophysical Society 0006-3495/01/02/606/07 $2.00
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O. Dushek and D. Coombs Analysis of Serial Engagement and Peptide-MHC Transport in T Cell Receptor Microclusters Biophys. J., May 1, 2008; 94(9): 3447 - 3460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. N. Arkhipov and I. V. Maly Quantitative Analysis of the Role of Receptor Recycling in T Cell Polarization Biophys. J., December 1, 2006; 91(11): 4306 - 4316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Wedagedera and N. J. Burroughs T-Cell Activation: A Queuing Theory Analysis at Low Agonist Density Biophys. J., September 1, 2006; 91(5): 1604 - 1618. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Jansson, E. Barnes, P. Klenerman, M. Harlen, P. Sorensen, S. J. Davis, and P. Nilsson A Theoretical Framework for Quantitative Analysis of the Molecular Basis of Costimulation J. Immunol., August 1, 2005; 175(3): 1575 - 1585. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Utzny, M. Faroudi, and S. Valitutti Frequency Encoding of T-Cell Receptor Engagement Dynamics in Calcium Time Series Biophys. J., January 1, 2005; 88(1): 1 - 14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Coombs and B. Goldstein Effects of the Geometry of the Immunological Synapse on the Delivery of Effector Molecules Biophys. J., October 1, 2004; 87(4): 2215 - 2220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Coombs, M. Dembo, C. Wofsy, and B. Goldstein Equilibrium Thermodynamics of Cell-Cell Adhesion Mediated by Multiple Ligand-Receptor Pairs Biophys. J., March 1, 2004; 86(3): 1408 - 1423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-J. E. Lee, Y. Hori, and A. K. Chakraborty Low T cell receptor expression and thermal fluctuations contribute to formation of dynamic multifocal synapses in thymocytes PNAS, April 15, 2003; 100(8): 4383 - 4388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Faeder, W. S. Hlavacek, I. Reischl, M. L. Blinov, H. Metzger, A. Redondo, C. Wofsy, and B. Goldstein Investigation of Early Events in Fc{epsilon}RI-Mediated Signaling Using a Detailed Mathematical Model J. Immunol., April 1, 2003; 170(7): 3769 - 3781. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |