| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Biophys J, February 2001, p. 626-634, Vol. 80, No. 2


and
*Department of Molecular Cell Physiology, BioCentrum Amsterdam,
Faculty of Biology, Vrije Universiteit, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, The
Netherlands;
Department of Biochemistry, University of
Stellenbosch, Matieland 7602, Stellenbosch, South Africa; and
Swammerdam Institute for Life Science, BioCentrum
Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, NL-1018 TV Amsterdam, The
Netherlands
It is becoming accepted that steady-state fluxes are not
necessarily controlled by single rate-limiting steps. This leaves open
the issue whether cellular dynamics are controlled by single pacemaker
enzymes, as has often been proposed. This paper shows that yeast sugar
transport has substantial but not complete control of the frequency of
glycolytic oscillations. Addition of maltose, a competitive inhibitor
of glucose transport, reduced both average glucose consumption flux and
frequency of glycolytic oscillations. Assuming a single kinetic
component and a symmetrical carrier, a frequency control coefficient of
between 0.4 and 0.6 and an average-flux control coefficient of between
0.6 and 0.9 were calculated for hexose transport activity. In a second
approach, mannose was used as the carbon and free-energy source, and
the dependencies on the extracellular mannose concentration of the
transport activity, of the frequency of oscillations, and of the
average flux were compared. In this case the frequency control
coefficient and the average-flux control coefficient of hexose
transport activity amounted to 0.7 and 0.9, respectively. From these
results, we conclude that 1) transport is highly important for the
dynamics of glycolysis, 2) most but not all control resides in glucose transport, and 3) there should at least be one step other than transport with substantial control.
Biophys J, February 2001, p. 626-634, Vol. 80, No. 2
© 2001 by the Biophysical Society 0006-3495/01/02/626/09 $2.00
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Postmus, A. B. Canelas, J. Bouwman, B. M. Bakker, W. van Gulik, M. J. T. de Mattos, S. Brul, and G. J. Smits Quantitative Analysis of the High Temperature-induced Glycolytic Flux Increase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Reveals Dominant Metabolic Regulation J. Biol. Chem., August 29, 2008; 283(35): 23524 - 23532. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. De Monte, F. d'Ovidio, S. Dano, and P. G. Sorensen Dynamical quorum sensing: Population density encoded in cellular dynamics PNAS, November 20, 2007; 104(47): 18377 - 18381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Wang, I. Birol, and V. Hatzimanikatis Metabolic Control Analysis under Uncertainty: Framework Development and Case Studies Biophys. J., December 1, 2004; 87(6): 3750 - 3763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Elbing, C. Larsson, R. M. Bill, E. Albers, J. L. Snoep, E. Boles, S. Hohmann, and L. Gustafsson Role of Hexose Transport in Control of Glycolytic Flux in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Appl. Envir. Microbiol., September 1, 2004; 70(9): 5323 - 5330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |