| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Biophys J, May 2001, p. 2152-2166, Vol. 80, No. 5
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, 69978 Israel
Two distinct forms of desensitization have been
characterized for N-methyl-D-aspartate
(NMDA) receptors. One form results from a weakening of agonist affinity
when channels are activated whereas the other form of desensitization
results when channels enter a long-lived nonconducting state. A
weakening of glycine affinity upon NMDA receptor activation has been
reported. Cyclic reaction schemes for NMDA receptor activation require
that a concomitant affinity shift should be observed for glutamate
agonists. In this study, measurements of peak and steady-state NMDA
receptor currents yielded EC50 values for
glutamate that differed by 1.9-fold, but no differences were found for
another agonist, L-cysteine-S-sulfate (LCSS). Simulations
show that shifts in EC50 values may be
masked by significant degrees of desensitization resulting from
channels entering a long-lived nonconducting state. Simulations also
show that a decrease in the degree of desensitization with increasing agonist concentration is a good indicator for the existence of desensitization resulting from a weakening of agonist affinity. Both
glutamate and LCSS exhibited this trend. An affinity difference of
three- to eightfold between high-and low-affinity agonist-binding states was estimated from fitting of dose-response data with models containing both types of desensitization. This indicates that activation of NMDA receptors causes a reduction in both glutamate and
glycine affinities.
Biophys J, May 2001, p. 2152-2166, Vol. 80, No. 5
© 2001 by the Biophysical Society 0006-3495/01/05/2152/15 $2.00
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. E. Featherstone and S. A. Shippy Regulation of Synaptic Transmission by Ambient Extracellular Glutamate Neuroscientist, April 1, 2008; 14(2): 171 - 181. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Schorge, S. Elenes, and D. Colquhoun Maximum likelihood fitting of single channel NMDA activity with a mechanism composed of independent dimers of subunits J. Physiol., December 1, 2005; 569(2): 395 - 418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Popescu and A. Auerbach The NMDA Receptor Gating Machine: Lessons from Single Channels Neuroscientist, June 1, 2004; 10(3): 192 - 198. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Vargas-Caballero and H. P. C. Robinson A Slow Fraction of Mg2+ Unblock of NMDA Receptors Limits Their Contribution to Spike Generation in Cortical Pyramidal Neurons J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2003; 89(5): 2778 - 2783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Nahum-Levy, E. Tam, S. Shavit, and M. Benveniste Glutamate But Not Glycine Agonist Affinity for NMDA Receptors Is Influenced by Small Cations J. Neurosci., April 1, 2002; 22(7): 2550 - 2560. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |