Biophys J, July 2001, p. 285-304, Vol. 81, No. 1

Interaction of Synthetic HA2 Influenza Fusion Peptide Analog with Model Membranes

Doncho V. Zhelev,^* Natalia Stoicheva,^* Peter Scherrer, and David Needham^*

 ^*Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708-0300 and  INEX Pharmaceuticals, Vancouver, British Columbia V6P 6P2, Canada

The interaction of the synthetic 21 amino acid peptide (AcE4K) with 1-oleoyl-2-[caproyl-7-NBD]-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine membranes is used as a model system for the pH-sensitive binding of fusion peptides to membranes. The sequence of AcE4K (Ac-GLFEAIAGFIENGWEGMIDGK) is based on the sequence of the hemagglutinin HA2 fusion peptide and has similar partitioning into phosphatidylcholine membranes as the viral peptide. pH-dependent partitioning in the membrane, circular dichroism, tryptophan fluorescence, change of membrane area, and membrane strength, are measured to characterize various key aspects of the peptide-membrane interaction. The experimental results show that the partitioning of AcE4K in the membrane is pH dependent. The bound peptide inserts in the membrane, which increases the overall membrane area in a pH-dependent manner, however the depth of insertion of the peptide in the membrane is independent of pH. This result suggests that the binding of the peptide to the membrane is driven by the protonation of its three glutamatic acids and the aspartic acid, which results in an increase of the number of bound molecules as the pH decreases from pH 7 to 4.5. The transition between the bound state and the free state is characterized by the Gibbs energy for peptide binding. This Gibbs energy for pH 5 is equal to 30.2 kJ/mol (7.2 kcal/mol). Most of the change of the Gibbs energy during the binding of AcE4K is due to the enthalpy of binding 27.3 kJ/mol (6.5 kcal/mol), while the entropy change is relatively small and is on the order of 6.4 J/mol·K (2.3 cal/mol·K). The energy barrier separating the bound and the free state, is characterized by the Gibbs energy of the transition state for peptide adsorption. This Gibbs energy is equal to 51.3 kJ/mol (12.3 kcal/mol). The insertion of the peptide into the membrane is coupled with work for creation of a vacancy for the peptide in the membrane. This work is calculated from the measured area occupied by a single peptide molecule (220 Å²) and the membrane elasticity (190 mN/m), and is equal to 15.5 kJ/mol (3.7 kcal/mol). The comparison of the work for creating a vacancy and the Gibbs energy of the transition state shows that the work for creating a vacancy may have significant effect on the rate of peptide insertion and therefore plays an important role in peptide binding. Because the work for creating a vacancy depends on membrane elasticity and the elasticity of the membrane is dependent on membrane composition, this provides a tool for modulating the pH for membrane instability by changing membrane composition. The insertion of the peptide in the membrane does not affect the membrane permeability for water, which shows that the peptide does not perturb substantially the packing of the hydrocarbon region. However, the ability of the membrane to retain solutes in the presence of peptide is compromised, suggesting that the inserted peptide promotes formation of short living pores. The integrity of the membrane is substantially compromised below pH 4.8 (threshold pH), when large pores are formed and the membrane breaks down. The binding of the peptide in the pore region is reversible, and the pore size varies on the experimental conditions, which suggests that the peptide in the pore region does not form oligomers.

Biophys J, July 2001, p. 285-304, Vol. 81, No. 1
© 2001 by the Biophysical Society   0006-3495/01/07/285/20  $2.00

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. H. Kim and J. A. Frangos Effects of Amyloid {beta}-Peptides on the Lysis Tension of Lipid Bilayer Vesicles Containing Oxysterols Biophys. J., July 15, 2008; 95(2): 620 - 628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Md. E. Haque, V. Koppaka, P. H. Axelsen, and B. R. Lentz Properties and Structures of the Influenza and HIV Fusion Peptides on Lipid Membranes: Implications for a Role in Fusion Biophys. J., November 1, 2005; 89(5): 3183 - 3194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. J. Tierney, D. E. Block, and M. L. Longo Elasticity and Phase Behavior of DPPC Membrane Modulated by Cholesterol, Ergosterol, and Ethanol Biophys. J., October 1, 2005; 89(4): 2481 - 2493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Vaccaro, K. J. Cross, J. Kleinjung, S. K. Straus, D. J. Thomas, S. A. Wharton, J. J. Skehel, and F. Fraternali Plasticity of Influenza Haemagglutinin Fusion Peptides and Their Interaction with Lipid Bilayers Biophys. J., January 1, 2005; 88(1): 25 - 36. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. L. Lau, D. S. Ege, J. D. Lear, D. A. Hammer, and W. F. DeGrado Oligomerization of Fusogenic Peptides Promotes Membrane Fusion by Enhancing Membrane Destabilization Biophys. J., January 1, 2004; 86(1): 272 - 284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Pata and N. Dan The Effect of Chain Length on Protein Solubilization in Polymer-Based Vesicles (Polymersomes) Biophys. J., October 1, 2003; 85(4): 2111 - 2118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Johnson, M. Xie, L. M. R. Singh, R. Edge, and R. B. Cornell Both Acidic and Basic Amino Acids in an Amphitropic Enzyme, CTP:Phosphocholine Cytidylyltransferase, Dictate Its Selectivity for Anionic Membranes J. Biol. Chem., January 3, 2003; 278(1): 514 - 522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]