Biophys J, November 2002, p. 2349-2359, Vol. 83, No. 5

A Reduced Model Clarifies the Role of Feedback Loops and Time Delays in the Drosophila Circadian Oscillator

Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, W. M. Keck Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, The University of Texas-Houston Medical School, Houston, Texas 77225 USA

Although several detailed models of molecular processes essential for circadian oscillations have been developed, their complexity makes intuitive understanding of the oscillation mechanism difficult. The goal of the present study was to reduce a previously developed, detailed model to a minimal representation of the transcriptional regulation essential for circadian rhythmicity in Drosophila. The reduced model contains only two differential equations, each with time delays. A negative feedback loop is included, in which PER protein represses per transcription by binding the dCLOCK transcription factor. A positive feedback loop is also included, in which dCLOCK indirectly enhances its own formation. The model simulated circadian oscillations, light entrainment, and a phase-response curve with qualitative similarities to experiment. Time delays were found to be essential for simulation of circadian oscillations with this model. To examine the robustness of the simplified model to fluctuations in molecule numbers, a stochastic variant was constructed. Robust circadian oscillations and entrainment to light pulses were simulated with fewer than 80 molecules of each gene product present on average. Circadian oscillations persisted when the positive feedback loop was removed. Moreover, elimination of positive feedback did not decrease the robustness of oscillations to stochastic fluctuations or to variations in parameter values. Such reduced models can aid understanding of the oscillation mechanisms in Drosophila and in other organisms in which feedback regulation of transcription may play an important role.

Biophys J, November 2002, p. 2349-2359, Vol. 83, No. 5
© 2002 by the Biophysical Society   0006-3495/02/11/2349/11  $2.00

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Q. Li and X. Lang Internal Noise-Sustained Circadian Rhythms in a Drosophila Model Biophys. J., March 15, 2008; 94(6): 1983 - 1994. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Song, P. Smolen, E. Av-Ron, D. A. Baxter, and J. H. Byrne Dynamics of a Minimal Model of Interlocked Positive and Negative Feedback Loops of Transcriptional Regulation by cAMP-Response Element Binding Proteins Biophys. J., May 15, 2007; 92(10): 3407 - 3424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Tomshine and Y. N. Kaznessis Optimization of a Stochastically Simulated Gene Network Model via Simulated Annealing Biophys. J., November 1, 2006; 91(9): 3196 - 3205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Kurosawa, K. Aihara, and Y. Iwasa A Model for the Circadian Rhythm of Cyanobacteria that Maintains Oscillation without Gene Expression Biophys. J., September 15, 2006; 91(6): 2015 - 2023. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. M. Tuttle, H. Salis, J. Tomshine, and Y. N. Kaznessis Model-Driven Designs of an Oscillating Gene Network Biophys. J., December 1, 2005; 89(6): 3873 - 3883. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Francois A Model for the Neurospora Circadian Clock Biophys. J., April 1, 2005; 88(4): 2369 - 2383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Becker-Weimann, J. Wolf, H. Herzel, and A. Kramer Modeling Feedback Loops of the Mammalian Circadian Oscillator Biophys. J., November 1, 2004; 87(5): 3023 - 3034. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Smolen, P. E. Hardin, B. S. Lo, D. A. Baxter, and J. H. Byrne Simulation of Drosophila Circadian Oscillations, Mutations, and Light Responses by a Model with VRI, PDP-1, and CLK Biophys. J., May 1, 2004; 86(5): 2786 - 2802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]