help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grabe, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nollert, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grabe, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nollert, P.
Biophysical Journal 84:854-868 (2003)
© 2003 The Biophysical Society

Protein Interactions and Membrane Geometry

Michael Grabe*, John Neu{dagger}, George Oster{ddagger} and Peter Nollert§

* Department of Physics, {dagger} Department of Mathematics, and {ddagger} Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology and College of Natural Resources, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 and § Department of Biochemistry & Biophysics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to George Oster, Dept. of ESPM, University of California, 201 Wellman Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-3112. Tel.: 510-642-5277; Fax: 510-642-7428; E-mail: goster{at}nature.berkeley.edu.

The difficulty in growing crystals for x-ray diffraction analysis has hindered the determination of membrane protein structures. However, this is changing with the advent of a new method for growing high quality membrane protein crystals from the lipidic cubic phase. Although successful, the mechanism underlying this method has remained unclear. Here, we present a theoretical analysis of the process. We show that it is energetically favorable for proteins embedded in the highly curved cubic phase to cluster together in flattened regions of the membrane. This stabilizes the lamellar phase, permitting its outgrowth from the cubic phase. A kinetic barrier-crossing model is developed to determine the free energy barrier to crystallization from the time-dependent growth of protein clusters. Determining the values of key parameters provides both a rational basis for optimizing the experimental procedure for membrane proteins that have not yet been crystallized and insight into the analogous cubic to lamellar transitions in cells. We also discuss the implications of this mechanism for protein sorting at the exit sites of the Golgi and endoplasmic reticulum and the general stabilization of membrane structures.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Gen. Physiol.Home page
S. Choe, K. A. Hecht, and M. Grabe
A Continuum Method for Determining Membrane Protein Insertion Energies and the Problem of Charged Residues
J. Gen. Physiol., May 26, 2008; 131(6): 563 - 573.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
E. Atilgan, D. Wirtz, and S. X. Sun
Morphology of the Lamellipodium and Organization of Actin Filaments at the Leading Edge of Crawling Cells
Biophys. J., November 1, 2005; 89(5): 3589 - 3602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Biophysical Society.