help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Miyata, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Miyata, H.
Biophysical Journal 84:2664-2670 (2003)
© 2003 The Biophysical Society

Probing the Cell Peripheral Movements by Optical Trapping Technique

Fuminori Takahashi, Yukako Higashino and Hidetake Miyata

Physics Department, Graduate School of Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8578, Japan

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Hidetake Miyata, Aramaki, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8578, Japan. Tel.: 81-22-217-6465; Fax: 81-22-217-6774; E-mail: miyata{at}bio.phys.tohoku.ac.jp.

Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts cultured on a poly-L-lysine-coated coverslip was stimulated with 0.5 µM phorbol myristate acetate, and the movements of the peripheral membranes were probed with a 1-µm polystyrene bead held in an optical trap. The bead brought into contact with the cell edge occasionally moved away from and returned to the original position. The movement ranged over 100 nm and occurred mainly in one direction, suggesting that the protruding cell membrane pushed the bead. The maximum velocities derived from individual pairs of protrusive and withdrawal movements exhibited a correlation, which is consistent with the previous reports. Acceleration and deceleration occurred both in the protrusive and withdrawal phases, indicating that the movements were regulated. Movement of the membrane occurred frequently with an ensemble-averaged maximum speed of 23 nm/s at the trap stiffness of 0.024 pN/nm, but it was strongly suppressed when the trap stiffness was increased to 0.090 pN/nm. Correlation of the protrusive and withdrawal velocities and the acceleration and deceleration both in the protrusive and withdrawal phases can be explained by the involvement of myosin motor at least in the withdrawal process. However, the fact that the movements were suppressed at higher trap stiffness implies a stochastic nature in the creation of the gap between the peripheral cell membrane and the actin network underlying it.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
S. Bohnet, R. Ananthakrishnan, A. Mogilner, J.-J. Meister, and A. B. Verkhovsky
Weak Force Stalls Protrusion at the Leading Edge of the Lamellipodium
Biophys. J., March 1, 2006; 90(5): 1810 - 1820.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Biophysical Society.