help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moran, O.
Right arrow Articles by Conti, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moran, O.
Right arrow Articles by Conti, F.
Biophysical Journal 84:2999-3006 (2003)
© 2003 The Biophysical Society

Tonic and Phasic Guanidinium Toxin-Block of Skeletal Muscle Na Channels Expressed in Mammalian Cells

Oscar Moran, Alessandra Picollo and Franco Conti

Istituto di Biofisica, Sezione di Genova, CNR, Genoa, Italy

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Oscar Moran, Istituto di Biofisica, Sezione di Genova, CNR, Via De Marini, 6, I-16149, Genoa, Italy. Fax: 39-010-647-5550; E-mail: moran{at}ge.cnr.it.

The blockage of skeletal muscle sodium channels by tetrodotoxin (TTX) and saxitoxin (STX) have been studied in CHO cells permanently expressing rat Nav1.4 channels. Tonic and use-dependent blockage were analyzed in the framework of the ion-trapped model. The tonic affinity (26.6 nM) and the maximum affinity (7.7 nM) of TTX, as well as the "on" and "off" rate constants measured in this preparation, are in remarkably good agreement with those measured for Nav1.2 expressed in frog oocytes, indicating that the structure of the toxin receptor of Nav1.4 and Nav1.2 channels are very similar and that the expression method does not have any influence on the pore properties of the sodium channel. The higher affinity of STX for the sodium channels (tonic and maximum affinity of 1.8 nM and 0.74 nM respectively) is explained as an increase on the "on" rate constant ({approx}0.03 s-1 nM-1), compared to that of TTX ({approx}0.003 s-1 nM-1), while the "off" rate constant is the same for both toxins ({approx}0.02 s-1). Estimations of the free-energy differences of the toxin-channel interaction indicate that STX is bound in a more external position than TTX. Similarly, the comparison of the toxins free energy of binding to a ion-free, Na+- and Ca2+-occupied channel, is consistent with a binding site in the selectivity filter for Ca2+ more external than for Na+. This data may be useful in further attempts at sodium-channel pore modeling.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Biophysical Society.