| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
The Forsyth Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Sidney Lees, The Forsyth Institute, 140 The Fenway, Boston, MA 02115.
It was previously found that the lateral spacing of the collagen molecules in wet mineralized tissues is exactly proportional to the inverse wet density. Several properties were investigated and the same type of relationship was observed each time. A possible explanation is offered. It is hypothesized that mineral is deposited initially in the extrafibrillar space so as to isolate the fibrils. Further deposition reduces the net free fibril volume thereby decreasing the spacing between collagen molecules. The linear relationship is derived from density considerations together with limitations on the collagen packing structure described as the generalized packing model. Three experimental situations were studied: lateral spacing wet tissue versus density; lateral spacing dry tissue versus density; and lateral spacing versus water content. The observed variations of the spacing can be attributed to a structure where the mass of the tissue remains constant but the volume decreases linearly with increasing mineral content.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. E. Chesnick, J. T. Mason, A. A. Giuseppetti, N. Eidelman, and K. Potter Magnetic Resonance Microscopy of Collagen Mineralization Biophys. J., August 15, 2008; 95(4): 2017 - 2026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Nikolov and D. Raabe Hierarchical Modeling of the Elastic Properties of Bone at Submicron Scales: The Role of Extrafibrillar Mineralization Biophys. J., June 1, 2008; 94(11): 4220 - 4232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Buehler Nature designs tough collagen: Explaining the nanostructure of collagen fibrils PNAS, August 15, 2006; 103(33): 12285 - 12290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Veis and A. Veis Mineralization in Organic Matrix Frameworks Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2003; 54(1): 249 - 289. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |