This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mittal, A. Articles by Bentz, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mittal, A. Articles by Bentz, J.

Kinetically Differentiating Influenza Hemagglutinin Fusion and Hemifusion Machines

Aditya Mittal ^* , Eugenia Leikina , Leonid V. Chernomordik  and Joe Bentz ^*

^* Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104; and Section on Membrane Biology, The Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Biophysics, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Dr. Joe Bentz, Dept. of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104. Tel.: 215-895-1513; Fax: 215-895-1273; Email: bentzj{at}drexel.edu.

Membrane fusion mediated by influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) yields different phenotypes depending on the surface density of activated HAs. A key question is whether different phenotypes arise from different fusion machines or whether different numbers of identical fusion machines yield different probabilistic outcomes. If fusion were simply a less probable event than hemifusion, requiring a larger number of identical fusion machines to occur first, then two predictions can be made. First, fusion should have a shorter average delay time than hemifusion, since there are more machines. Second, fusion should have a longer execution time of lipid mixing after it begins than hemifusion, since the full event cannot be faster than the partial event. Using a new automated video microscopy technique, we simultaneously monitored many HA-expressing cells fusing with erythrocytes and identified individual cell pairs with either full or only partial redistribution of fluorescent lipids. The full lipid mixing phenotype also showed contents mixing, i.e., fusion. Kinetic screening of the digitized fluorescence data showed that the execution of lipid mixing after the onset is faster for fusion than hemifusion. We found no correlation between the delay times before the onset of lipid mixing and the final fusion phenotype. We also found that the execution time for fusion was faster than that for hemifusion. Thus, we provide the first experimental evidence for fusion and hemifusion arising from different machines.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. A. Zhukovsky, E. Leikina, I. Markovic, A. L. Bailey, and L. V. Chernomordik Heterogeneity of Early Intermediates in Cell-Liposome Fusion Mediated by Influenza Hemagglutinin Biophys. J., November 1, 2006; 91(9): 3349 - 3358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Zaitseva, A. Mittal, D. E. Griffin, and L. V. Chernomordik Class II fusion protein of alphaviruses drives membrane fusion through the same pathway as class I proteins J. Cell Biol., April 11, 2005; 169(1): 167 - 177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Roche and Y. Gaudin Evidence that Rabies Virus Forms Different Kinds of Fusion Machines with Different pH Thresholds for Fusion J. Virol., August 15, 2004; 78(16): 8746 - 8752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]