help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karcher, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kaazempur-Mofrad, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Karcher, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kaazempur-Mofrad, M. R.
Biophysical Journal 85:3336-3349 (2003)
© 2003 The Biophysical Society

A Three-Dimensional Viscoelastic Model for Cell Deformation with Experimental Verification

Hélène Karcher *, Jan Lammerding {dagger}, Hayden Huang {dagger}, Richard T. Lee {dagger}, Roger D. Kamm * and Mohammad R. Kaazempur-Mofrad *

* Department of Mechanical Engineering and Division of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts; and {dagger} Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Prof. Roger D. Kamm, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Rm. 3-260, Cambridge, MA 02139. Tel.: 617-253-5330; Fax: 617-258-8559; E-mail: rdkamm{at}mit.edu.

A three-dimensional viscoelastic finite element model is developed for cell micromanipulation by magnetocytometry. The model provides a robust tool for analysis of detailed strain/stress fields induced in the cell monolayer produced by forcing one microbead attached atop a single cell or cell monolayer on a basal substrate. Both the membrane/cortex and the cytoskeleton are modeled as Maxwell viscoelastic materials, but the structural effect of the membrane/cortex was found to be negligible on the timescales corresponding to magnetocytometry. Numerical predictions are validated against experiments performed on NIH 3T3 fibroblasts and previous experimental work. The system proved to be linear with respect to cytoskeleton mechanical properties and bead forcing. Stress and strain patterns were highly localized, suggesting that the effects of magnetocytometry are confined to a region extending <10 µm from the bead. Modulation of cell height has little effect on the results, provided the monolayer is >5 µm thick. NIH 3T3 fibroblasts exhibited a viscoelastic timescale of ~1 s and a shear modulus of ~1000 Pa.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
M. Jonas, H. Huang, R. D. Kamm, and P. T. C. So
Fast Fluorescence Laser Tracking Microrheometry, II: Quantitative Studies of Cytoskeletal Mechanotransduction
Biophys. J., July 15, 2008; 95(2): 895 - 909.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
D. Icard-Arcizet, O. Cardoso, A. Richert, and S. Henon
Cell Stiffening in Response to External Stress is Correlated to Actin Recruitment
Biophys. J., April 1, 2008; 94(7): 2906 - 2913.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
S. Tada, C. Dong, and J. M. Tarbell
Effect of the Stress Phase Angle on the Strain Energy Density of the Endothelial Plasma Membrane
Biophys. J., November 1, 2007; 93(9): 3026 - 3033.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
R. G. Bacabac, T. H. Smit, J. J. W. A. Van Loon, B. Z. Doulabi, M. Helder, and J. Klein-Nulend
Bone cell responses to high-frequency vibration stress: does the nucleus oscillate within the cytoplasm?
FASEB J, May 1, 2006; 20(7): 858 - 864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
A. H. B. de Vries, B. E. Krenn, R. van Driel, and J. S. Kanger
Micro Magnetic Tweezers for Nanomanipulation Inside Live Cells
Biophys. J., March 1, 2005; 88(3): 2137 - 2144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
D. Pesen and J. H. Hoh
Micromechanical Architecture of the Endothelial Cell Cortex
Biophys. J., January 1, 2005; 88(1): 670 - 679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
H. Huang, J. Sylvan, M. Jonas, R. Barresi, P. T. C. So, K. P. Campbell, and R. T. Lee
Cell stiffness and receptors: evidence for cytoskeletal subnetworks
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, January 1, 2005; 288(1): C72 - C80.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
P. J. Mack, M. R. Kaazempur-Mofrad, H. Karcher, R. T. Lee, and R. D. Kamm
Force-induced focal adhesion translocation: effects of force amplitude and frequency
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, October 1, 2004; 287(4): C954 - C962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
M. Puig-de-Morales, E. Millet, B. Fabry, D. Navajas, N. Wang, J. P. Butler, and J. J. Fredberg
Cytoskeletal mechanics in adherent human airway smooth muscle cells: probe specificity and scaling of protein-protein dynamics
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, September 1, 2004; 287(3): C643 - C654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
H. Huang, R. D. Kamm, and R. T. Lee
Cell mechanics and mechanotransduction: pathways, probes, and physiology
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, July 1, 2004; 287(1): C1 - C11.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Biophysical Society.