help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yu, X.
Right arrow Articles by Carlsson, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yu, X.
Right arrow Articles by Carlsson, A. E.
Biophysical Journal 85:3532-3543 (2003)
© 2003 The Biophysical Society

Multiscale Study of Counterion-Induced Attraction and Bundle Formation of F-Actin Using an Ising-like Mean-Field Model

Xueping Yu and A. E. Carlsson

Physics Department, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Xueping Yu, Campus Box 1105, Washington University, Dept. of Physics, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130. Tel.: 314-935-5739; Fax: 314-935-6219; E-mail: xyu{at}artsci.wust1.edu.

An Ising-like counterion-binding model is developed and solved by a mean-field method. For G-actin, the calculated affinity constants of all the binding sites ranging from loose to tight binding match the experimental data. The model is used to calculate the interaction energy between two F-actin filaments. Within a certain counterion concentration range, a rapidly decaying attractive force between two parallel filaments is produced not only by the correlation of the counterion distributions on the two filaments, but also by the correlation of the configurations of the two filaments with fixed counterion positions, which has been ignored in previous calculations. The bundling energy depends strongly on the configuration of the filaments. Upon bundling, the tightly bound counterion site is not affected, but the medium and loosely bound ones are. The model reproduces the observed minimal divalent counterion concentration for bundling, and naturally predicts the resolubilization of bundles which is seen in recent experiments. At the optimal counterion concentration, we obtain a bundling energy of ~-0.01 eV per monomer along the filament. The counterion valence strongly affects the optimal counterion concentration, but has only minor effects on the optimal bundling energy. We show that the attractive potential between filaments can be simplified as the sum of interactions between their monomers. This simplification makes it possible to calculate the exact free energy of a two-F-actin-filament system. We are thus able to probe the effects of filament length on F-actin bundling and obtain a critical length for bundling of 59 monomers at 1 µM monomer concentration and pH = 7.2.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
L. Yang, D. Sept, and A. E. Carlsson
Energetics and Dynamics of Constrained Actin Filament Bundling
Biophys. J., June 15, 2006; 90(12): 4295 - 4304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
X. Yu and A. E. Carlsson
Kinetics of Filament Bundling with Attractive Interactions
Biophys. J., December 1, 2004; 87(6): 3679 - 3689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Biophysical Society.