This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Carlsson, A. E. Articles by Cooper, J. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Carlsson, A. E. Articles by Cooper, J. A.

End versus Side Branching by Arp2/3 Complex

A. E. Carlsson ^*, M. A. Wear  and J. A. Cooper 

^* Department of Physics, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri and Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to A. E. Carlsson, Dept. of Physics, Washington University, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130. Tel.: 314-935-5739; E-mail: aec{at}wuphys.wustl.edu.

We investigate the issue of end versus side branching of actin filaments by Arp2/3 complex, using a combination of analytic theory, polymerization assays, and quantitative modeling. The analytic theory shows that the effect of capping protein on the initial stages of actin polymerization in the presence of Arp2/3 complex depends strongly on whether new Arp2/3 complex-induced branches grow from the sides or ends of existing filaments. Motivated by these results, we measure and quantitatively model the kinetics of actin polymerization in the presence of activated Arp2/3 complex, for a range of concentrations of capping protein. Our model includes the most important types of events involving actin and actin-binding proteins, and can be adjusted to include end branching, side branching, or both. The side-branching model gives a better fit to the experimental data than the end-branching model. An end-plus-side model including both types of branching gives a moderate improvement in the quality of the fit. Another side-branching model, based on aging of subunits' capacity for branch formation, gives a significantly better fit than the end-plus-side model. We discuss implications for actin polymerization in cells.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. J. Brooks and A. E. Carlsson Actin Polymerization Overshoots and ATP Hydrolysis as Assayed by Pyrene Fluorescence Biophys. J., August 1, 2008; 95(3): 1050 - 1062. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. T. Dawes and L. Edelstein-Keshet Phosphoinositides and Rho Proteins Spatially Regulate Actin Polymerization to Initiate and Maintain Directed Movement in a One-Dimensional Model of a Motile Cell Biophys. J., February 1, 2007; 92(3): 744 - 768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Yang, D. Sept, and A. E. Carlsson Energetics and Dynamics of Constrained Actin Filament Bundling Biophys. J., June 15, 2006; 90(12): 4295 - 4304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Haviv, Y. Brill-Karniely, R. Mahaffy, F. Backouche, A. Ben-Shaul, T. D. Pollard, and A. Bernheim-Groswasser Reconstitution of the transition from lamellipodium to filopodium in a membrane-free system PNAS, March 28, 2006; 103(13): 4906 - 4911. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. E. Carlsson Stimulation of Actin Polymerization by Filament Severing Biophys. J., January 15, 2006; 90(2): 413 - 422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. E. Carlsson The Effect of Branching on the Critical Concentration and Average Filament Length of Actin Biophys. J., July 1, 2005; 89(1): 130 - 140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]