| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
* Helsinki Biophysics & Biomembrane Group, Institute of Biomedicine, University of Helsinki, Finland; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Helsinki, Finland; and MEMPHYS—Center for Biomembrane Physics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Paavo K. J. Kinnunen, Institute of Biomedicine/Biochemistry, PO Box 63 (Biomedicum, Haartmaninkatu 8), FIN-00014, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. Tel.: 358-9-191-25400; Fax: 358-9-191-25444; E-mail: paavo.kinnunen{at}helsinki.fi.
The putative specific interaction and complex formation by sphingomyelin and cholesterol was investigated. Accordingly, low contents (1 mol % each) of fluorescently labeled derivatives of these lipids, namely 1-palmitoyl-2[10-(pyren-1-yl)]decanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (PyrPC), n-[10-(1-pyrenyl)decanoyl]sphingomyelin (PyrSM), and increasing concentrations of cholesterol (up to 5 mol %), were included in large unilamellar vesicles composed of 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DMPC) or 1,2-dinervonoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DNPC), and the excimer/monomer fluorescence emission ratio (Ie/Im) was measured. In DNPC below the main phase transition, the addition of up to 5 mol % cholesterol reduced Ie/Im significantly. Except for this, cholesterol had only a negligible effect in both matrices and for both probes. We then compared the efficiency of resonance energy transfer from PyrPC and PyrSM to 22-(n-(7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazol-4-yl)amino)-23,24-bisnor-5-cholen-3ß-ol (NBDchol). An augmenting colocalization of the latter resonance energy transfer pair with temperature was observed in a DMPC matrix below the main phase transition. In contrast, compared to PyrSM the colocalization of PyrPC with NBDchol was more efficient in the longer DNPC matrix. These results could be confirmed using 5,6-dibromo-cholestan-3ß-ol as a collisional quencher for the pyrene-labeled lipids. The results indicate lack of a specific interaction between sphingomyelin and cholesterol, and further imply that hydrophobic mismatch between the lipid constituents could provide the driving force for the cosegregation of sphingomyelin and cholesterol in fluid phospholipid bilayers of thicknesses comparable to those found for biomembranes.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  A. Kuksis and W. Pruzanski Phase composition of lipoprotein SM/cholesterol/PtdCho affects FA specificity of sPLA2s J. Lipid Res., October 1, 2008; 49(10): 2161 - 2168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Sabatini, J.-P. Mattila, and P. K. J. Kinnunen Interfacial Behavior of Cholesterol, Ergosterol, and Lanosterol in Mixtures with DPPC and DMPC Biophys. J., September 1, 2008; 95(5): 2340 - 2355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. M. Stott, M. P. Vu, C. O. McLemore, M. S. Lund, E. Gibbons, T. J. Brueseke, H. A. Wilson-Ashworth, and J. D. Bell Use of fluorescence to determine the effects of cholesterol on lipid behavior in sphingomyelin liposomes and erythrocyte membranes J. Lipid Res., June 1, 2008; 49(6): 1202 - 1215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Aittoniemi, P. S. Niemela, M. T. Hyvonen, M. Karttunen, and I. Vattulainen Insight into the Putative Specific Interactions between Cholesterol, Sphingomyelin, and Palmitoyl-Oleoyl Phosphatidylcholine Biophys. J., February 15, 2007; 92(4): 1125 - 1137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Y. Bhide, Z. Zhang, and M. L. Berkowitz Molecular Dynamics Simulations of SOPS and Sphingomyelin Bilayers Containing Cholesterol Biophys. J., February 15, 2007; 92(4): 1284 - 1295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Rog and M. Pasenkiewicz-Gierula Cholesterol-Sphingomyelin Interactions: A Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study Biophys. J., November 15, 2006; 91(10): 3756 - 3767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Tsamaloukas, H. Szadkowska, and H. Heerklotz Thermodynamic Comparison of the Interactions of Cholesterol with Unsaturated Phospholipid and Sphingomyelins Biophys. J., June 15, 2006; 90(12): 4479 - 4487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. S. Niemela, M. T. Hyvonen, and I. Vattulainen Influence of Chain Length and Unsaturation on Sphingomyelin Bilayers Biophys. J., February 1, 2006; 90(3): 851 - 863. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. Lange, J. Ye, and T. L. Steck Activation of Membrane Cholesterol by Displacement from Phospholipids J. Biol. Chem., October 28, 2005; 280(43): 36126 - 36131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Niemela, M. T. Hyvonen, and I. Vattulainen Structure and Dynamics of Sphingomyelin Bilayer: Insight Gained through Systematic Comparison to Phosphatidylcholine Biophys. J., November 1, 2004; 87(5): 2976 - 2989. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. A. Pandit, E. Jakobsson, and H. L. Scott Simulation of the Early Stages of Nano-Domain Formation in Mixed Bilayers of Sphingomyelin, Cholesterol, and Dioleylphosphatidylcholine Biophys. J., November 1, 2004; 87(5): 3312 - 3322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. A. Pandit, S. Vasudevan, S. W. Chiu, R. J. Mashl, E. Jakobsson, and H. L. Scott Sphingomyelin-Cholesterol Domains in Phospholipid Membranes: Atomistic Simulation Biophys. J., August 1, 2004; 87(2): 1092 - 1100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J.-M. I. Alakoskela, T. Soderlund, J. M. Holopainen, and P. K. J. Kinnunen Dipole Potential and Head-Group Spacing Are Determinants for the Membrane Partitioning of Pregnanolone Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2004; 66(1): 161 - 168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
