help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Drain, P.
Right arrow Articles by Li, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Drain, P.
Right arrow Articles by Li, L.
Biophysical Journal 86:2101-2112 (2004)
© 2004 The Biophysical Society

Concerted Gating Mechanism Underlying KATP Channel Inhibition by ATP

Peter Drain, Xuehui Geng and Lehong Li

Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Peter Drain, Biomedical Science Tower Rm. 323, 3500 Terrace St., Pittsburgh, PA 15261. Tel.: 412-648-9412; Fax: 412-648-8792; E-mail: drain{at}pitt.edu.

KATP channels assemble from four regulatory SUR1 and four pore-forming Kir6.2 subunits. At the single-channel current level, ATP-dependent gating transitions between the active burst and the inactive interburst conformations underlie inhibition of the KATP channel by intracellular ATP. Previously, we identified a slow gating mutation, T171A in the Kir6.2 subunit, which dramatically reduces rates of burst to interburst transitions in Kir6.2{Delta}C26 channels without SUR1 in the absence of ATP. Here, we constructed all possible mutations at position 171 in Kir6.2{Delta}C26 channels without SUR1. Only four substitutions, 171A, 171F, 171H, and 171S, gave rise to functional channels, each increasing Ki,ATP for ATP inhibition by >55-fold and slowing gating to the interburst by >35-fold. Moreover, we investigated the role of individual Kir6.2 subunits in the gating by comparing burst to interburst transition rates of channels constructed from different combinations of slow 171A and fast T171 "wild-type" subunits. The relationship between gating transition rate and number of slow subunits is exponential, which excludes independent gating models where any one subunit is sufficient for inhibition gating. Rather, our results support mechanisms where four ATP sites independently can control a single gate formed by the concerted action of all four Kir6.2 subunit inner helices of the KATP channel.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Gen. Physiol.Home page
T. J. Craig, F. M. Ashcroft, and P. Proks
How ATP Inhibits the Open KATP Channel
J. Gen. Physiol., July 1, 2008; 132(1): 131 - 144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
S. M. Y. Makary, T. W. Claydon, K. M. Dibb, and M. R. Boyett
Base of Pore Loop Is Important for Rectification, Activation, Permeation, and Block of Kir3.1/Kir3.4
Biophys. J., June 1, 2006; 90(11): 4018 - 4034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Physiol.Home page
L. Li, X. Geng, M. Yonkunas, A. Su, E. Densmore, P. Tang, and P. Drain
Ligand-dependent Linkage of the ATP Site to Inhibition Gate Closure in the KATP Channel
J. Gen. Physiol., August 29, 2005; 126(3): 285 - 299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Biophysical Society.