help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bloom, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Adami, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bloom, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Adami, C.
Biophysical Journal 86:2758-2764 (2004)
© 2004 The Biophysical Society

Stability and the Evolvability of Function in a Model Protein

Jesse D. Bloom * {dagger}, Claus O. Wilke {dagger}, Frances H. Arnold {ddagger} and Christoph Adami {dagger} §

* Department of Chemistry, {dagger} Digital Life Laboratory; {ddagger} Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering; and § Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Jesse D. Bloom, California Institute of Technology, 210-41, Pasadena, CA 91125. Tel.: 626-354-2565; Fax: 626-568-8743; E-mail: bloom{at}caltech.edu.

Functional proteins must fold with some minimal stability to a structure that can perform a biochemical task. Here we use a simple model to investigate the relationship between the stability requirement and the capacity of a protein to evolve the function of binding to a ligand. Although our model contains no built-in tradeoff between stability and function, proteins evolved function more efficiently when the stability requirement was relaxed. Proteins with both high stability and high function evolved more efficiently when the stability requirement was gradually increased than when there was constant selection for high stability. These results show that in our model, the evolution of function is enhanced by allowing proteins to explore sequences corresponding to marginally stable structures, and that it is easier to improve stability while maintaining high function than to improve function while maintaining high stability. Our model also demonstrates that even in the absence of a fundamental biophysical tradeoff between stability and function, the speed with which function can evolve is limited by the stability requirement imposed on the protein.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
V. K. Dubey, J. Lee, and M. Blaber
Redesigning symmetry-related "mini-core" regions of FGF-1 to increase primary structure symmetry: Thermodynamic and functional consequences of structural symmetry
Protein Sci., September 1, 2005; 14(9): 2315 - 2323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
R. Wroe, E. Bornberg-Bauer, and H. S. Chan
Comparing Folding Codes in Simple Heteropolymer Models of Protein Evolutionary Landscape: Robustness of the Superfunnel Paradigm
Biophys. J., January 1, 2005; 88(1): 118 - 131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Biophysical Society.