| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, W. M. Keck Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, The University of Texas-Houston Medical School, Houston, Texas; and * Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
Correspondence: Address reprint requests to John H. Byrne, Dept. of Neurobiology and Anatomy, W. M. Keck Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, The University of Texas-Houston Medical School, PO Box 20708, Houston, TX 77225. Tel.: 713-500-5602; Fax: 713-500-0623; E-mail: john.h.byrne{at}uth.tmc.edu.
A model of Drosophila circadian rhythm generation was developed to represent feedback loops based on transcriptional regulation of per, Clk (dclock), Pdp-1, and vri (vrille). The model postulates that histone acetylation kinetics make transcriptional activation a nonlinear function of [CLK]. Such a nonlinearity is essential to simulate robust circadian oscillations of transcription in our model and in previous models. Simulations suggest that two positive feedback loops involving Clk are not essential for oscillations, because oscillations of [PER] were preserved when Clk, vri, or Pdp-1 expression was fixed. However, eliminating positive feedback by fixing vri expression altered the oscillation period. Eliminating the negative feedback loop in which PER represses per expression abolished oscillations. Simulations of per or Clk null mutations, of per overexpression, and of vri, Clk, or Pdp-1 heterozygous null mutations altered model behavior in ways similar to experimental data. The model simulated a photic phase-response curve resembling experimental curves, and oscillations entrained to simulated light-dark cycles. Temperature compensation of oscillation period could be simulated if temperature elevation slowed PER nuclear entry or PER phosphorylation. The model makes experimental predictions, some of which could be tested in transgenic Drosophila.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. I. Hong, I. W. Jolma, J. J. Loros, J. C. Dunlap, and P. Ruoff Simulating Dark Expressions and Interactions of frq and wc-1 in the Neurospora Circadian Clock Biophys. J., February 15, 2008; 94(4): 1221 - 1232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-R. Kim, Y. Yoon, and K.-H. Cho Coupled Feedback Loops Form Dynamic Motifs of Cellular Networks Biophys. J., January 15, 2008; 94(2): 359 - 365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Gonze, S. Bernard, C. Waltermann, A. Kramer, and H. Herzel Spontaneous Synchronization of Coupled Circadian Oscillators Biophys. J., July 1, 2005; 89(1): 120 - 129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Becker-Weimann, J. Wolf, H. Herzel, and A. Kramer Modeling Feedback Loops of the Mammalian Circadian Oscillator Biophys. J., November 1, 2004; 87(5): 3023 - 3034. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |