help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kuntz, I. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kuntz, I. D.
Biophysical Journal 87:113-120 (2004)
© 2004 The Biophysical Society

Distributions in Protein Conformation Space: Implications for Structure Prediction and Entropy

David C. Sullivan and Irwin D. Kuntz

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-2240

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Irwin D. Kuntz, Dept. of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-2240. Tel.: 415-476-1937; Fax: 415-502-1411; E-mail: kuntz{at}cgl.ucsf.edu.

By considering how polymer structures are distributed in conformation space, we show that it is possible to quantify the difficulty of structural prediction and to provide a measure of progress for prediction calculations. The critical issue is the probability that a conformation is found within a specified distance of another conformer. We address this question by constructing a cumulative distribution function (CDF) for the average probability from observations about its limiting behavior at small displacements and numerical simulations of polyalanine chains. We can use the CDF to estimate the likelihood that a structure prediction is better than random chance. For example, the chance of randomly predicting the native backbone structure of a 150-amino-acid protein to low resolution, say within 6 Å, is 10–14. A high-resolution structural prediction, say to 2 Å, is immensely more difficult (10–57). With additional assumptions, the CDF yields the conformational entropy of protein folding from native-state coordinate variance. Or, using values of the conformational entropy change on folding, we can estimate the native state's conformational span. For example, for a 150-mer protein, equilibrium {alpha}-carbon displacements in the native ensemble would be 0.3–0.5 Å based on T{Delta}S of 1.42 kcal/(mol residue).




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
T. Aynechi and I. D. Kuntz
An Information Theoretic Approach to Macromolecular Modeling: I. Sequence Alignments
Biophys. J., November 1, 2005; 89(5): 2998 - 3007.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
T. Aynechi and I. D. Kuntz
An Information Theoretic Approach to Macromolecular Modeling: II. Force Fields
Biophys. J., November 1, 2005; 89(5): 3008 - 3016.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Biophysical Society.