help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oh, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bargiello, T. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oh, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bargiello, T. A.
Biophysical Journal 87:912-928 (2004)
© 2004 The Biophysical Society

Determinants of Gating Polarity of a Connexin 32 Hemichannel

Seunghoon Oh, Shira Rivkin, Qingxiu Tang, Vytas K. Verselis and Thaddeus A. Bargiello

Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Dr. T. A. Bargiello, Dept. of Neuroscience, Kennedy Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1410 Pelham Parkway South, Bronx, NY 10461. Fax: 718-430-8821; E-mail: bargiell{at}aecom.yu.edu.

There is good evidence supporting the view that the transjunctional voltage sensor (Vj-sensor) of Cx32 and other Group 1 connexins is contained within a segment of the N-terminus that contributes to the formation of the channel pore. We have shown that the addition of negatively charged amino acid residues at several positions within the first 10 amino acid residues reverses the polarity of Vj-gating and proposed that channel closure is initiated by the inward movement of this region. Here, we report that positive charge substitutions of the 2nd, 5th, and 8th residues maintain the negative polarity of Vj-gating. These data are consistent with the original gating model. Surprisingly, some channels containing combinations of positive and/or negative charges at the 2nd and 5th positions display bipolar Vj-gating. The appearance of bipolar gating does not correlate with relative orientation of charges at this position. However, the voltage sensitivity of bipolar channels correlates with the sign of the charge at the 2nd residue, suggesting that charges at this position may have a larger role in determining gating polarity. Taken together with previous findings, the results suggest that the polarity Vj-gating is not determined by the sign of the charge lying closest to the cytoplasmic entry of the channel, nor is it likely to result from the reorientation of an electrical dipole contained in the N-terminus. We further explore the mechanism of polarity determination by utilizing the one-dimensional Poisson-Nernst-Plank model to determine the voltage profile of simple model channels containing regions of permanent charge within the channel pore. These considerations demonstrate how local variations in the electric field may influence the polarity and sensitivity of Vj-gating but are unlikely to account for the appearance of bipolar Vj-gating.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
S. Oh, V. K. Verselis, and T. A. Bargiello
Charges dispersed over the permeation pathway determine the charge selectivity and conductance of a Cx32 chimeric hemichannel
J. Physiol., May 15, 2008; 586(10): 2445 - 2461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
M. Srinivas, J. Kronengold, F. F. Bukauskas, T. A. Bargiello, and V. K. Verselis
Correlative Studies of Gating in Cx46 and Cx50 Hemichannels and Gap Junction Channels
Biophys. J., March 1, 2005; 88(3): 1725 - 1739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Biophysical Society.