help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haddy, A.
Right arrow Articles by Frank, H. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haddy, A.
Right arrow Articles by Frank, H. A.
Biophysical Journal 87:2885-2896 (2004)
© 2004 The Biophysical Society

Q-Band EPR of the S2 State of Photosystem II Confirms an S = 5/2 Origin of the X-Band g = 4.1 Signal

Alice Haddy *, K. V. Lakshmi {dagger}, Gary W. Brudvig {dagger} and Harry A. Frank {ddagger}

* Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of North Carolina, Greensboro, North Carolina; {dagger} Department of Chemistry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; and {ddagger} Department of Chemistry, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Alice Haddy, Dept. of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of North Carolina, Greensboro, NC 27402. Tel.: 336-334-4605; Fax: 336-334-5402; E-mail: aehaddy{at}uncg.edu.

Disagreement has remained about the spin state origin of the g = 4.1 EPR signal observed at X-band (9 GHz) from the S2 oxidation state of the Mn cluster of Photosystem II. In this study, the S2 state of PSII-enriched membrane fragments was examined at Q-band (34 GHz), with special interest in low-field signals. Light-induced signals at g = 3.1 and g = 4.6 were observed. The intensity of the signal at g = 3.1 was enhanced by the presence of F and suppressed by the presence of 5% ethanol, indicating that it was from the same spin system as the X-band signal at g = 4.1. The Q-band signal at g = 4.6 was also enhanced by F, but not suppressed by 5% ethanol, making its identity less clear. Although it can be accounted for by the same spin system, other sources for the signal are considered. The observation of the signal at g = 3.1 agrees well with a previous study at 15.5 GHz, in which the X-band g = 4.1 signal was proposed to arise from the middle Kramers doublet of a near rhombic S = 5/2 system. Zero-field splitting values of D = 0.455 cm–1 and E/D = 0.25 are used to simulate the spectra.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Biophysical Society.