| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Columbia University, New York, New York; and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York
Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Barry Honig, Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Columbia University, 630 W. 168th St., New York, NY 10032. Tel.: 212-305-7970; E-mail: bh6{at}columbia.edu.
This article presents the results of a detailed analysis of helix-helix interactions in membrane and soluble proteins. A data set of interacting pairs of helices in membrane proteins of known structure was constructed and a structure alignment algorithm was used to identify pairs of helices in soluble proteins that superimpose well with pairs of helices in the membrane-protein data set. Most helix pairs in membrane proteins are found to have a significant number of structural homologs in soluble proteins, although in some cases, primarily involving irregular helices, no close homologs exist. An analysis of geometric relationships between interacting helices in the two sets of proteins identifies some differences in the distributions of helix length, interfacial area, packing angle, and distance between the polypeptide backbones. However, a subset of soluble-protein helix pairs that are close structural homologs to membrane-protein helix pairs exhibits distributions that mirror those observed in membrane proteins. The larger average interface size and smaller distance of closest approach seen for helices in membrane proteins appears due in part to a relative enrichment of alanines and glycines, particularly as components of the AxxxA and GxxxG motifs. It is argued that membrane helices are not on average more tightly packed than helices in soluble proteins; they are simply able to approach each other more closely. This enables them to interact over longer distances, which may in turn facilitate their remaining in contact over much of the width of the lipid bilayer. The close structural similarity seen between some pairs of helices in membrane and soluble proteins suggests that packing patterns observed in soluble proteins may be useful in the modeling of membrane proteins. Moreover, there do not appear to be fundamental differences between the magnitude of the forces that drive helix packing in membrane and soluble proteins, suggesting that strategies to make membrane proteins more soluble by mutating surface residues are likely to encounter success, at least in some cases.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  P. W. Hildebrand, S. Gunther, A. Goede, L. Forrest, C. Frommel, and R. Preissner Hydrogen-Bonding and Packing Features of Membrane Proteins: Functional Implications Biophys. J., March 15, 2008; 94(6): 1945 - 1953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. Pabuwal and Z. Li Network pattern of residue packing in helical membrane proteins and its application in membrane protein structure prediction Protein Eng. Des. Sel., January 3, 2008; (2008) gzm059v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. F. S. Walters and W. F. DeGrado Helix-packing motifs in membrane proteins PNAS, September 12, 2006; 103(37): 13658 - 13663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Sparr, W. L. Ash, P. V. Nazarov, D. T. S. Rijkers, M. A. Hemminga, D. P. Tieleman, and J. A. Killian Self-association of Transmembrane {alpha}-Helices in Model Membranes: IMPORTANCE OF HELIX ORIENTATION AND ROLE OF HYDROPHOBIC MISMATCH J. Biol. Chem., November 25, 2005; 280(47): 39324 - 39331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
