help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Originally published as Biophys J. BioFAST on November 12, 2004.
doi:10.1529/biophysj.104.051052
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.104.051052v1
88/2/1300    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sinha, S.
Right arrow Articles by Surolia, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sinha, S.
Right arrow Articles by Surolia, A.
Biophysical Journal 88:1300-1310 (2005)
© 2005 The Biophysical Society

Unfolding Studies on Soybean Agglutinin and Concanavalin A Tetramers: A Comparative Account

Sharmistha Sinha, Nivedita Mitra, Gyanendra Kumar, Kanika Bajaj and Avadhesha Surolia

Molecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore-560012, India

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Avadhesha Surolia, Molecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore-560012, India. Tel.: 91-80-22932714; Fax: 91-80-23600535; E-mail: surolia{at}mbu.iisc.ernet.in.

The unfolding pathway of two very similar tetrameric legume lectins soybean agglutinin (SBA) and Concanavalin A (ConA) were determined using GdnCl-induced denaturation. Both proteins displayed a reversible two-state unfolding mechanism. The analysis of isothermal denaturation data provided values for conformational stability of the two proteins. It was found that the {Delta}G of unfolding of SBA was much higher than ConA at all the temperatures at which the experiments were done. ConA had a Tg 18°C less than SBA. The higher conformational stability of SBA in comparison to ConA is largely due to substantial differences in their degrees of subunit interactions. Ionic interactions at the interface of the two proteins especially at the noncanonical interface seem to play a significant role in the observed stability differences between these two proteins. Furthermore, SBA is a glycoprotein with a GlcNac2Man9 chain attached to Asn-75 of each subunit. The sugar chain in SBA lies at the noncanonical interface of the protein, and it is found to interact with the amino acid residues in the adjacent noncanonical interface. These interactions further stabilize SBA with respect to ConA, which is not glycosylated.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
S. Sinha and A. Surolia
Attributes of Glycosylation in the Establishment of the Unfolding Pathway of Soybean Agglutinin
Biophys. J., January 1, 2007; 92(1): 208 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
S. Sinha and A. Surolia
Oligomerization Endows Enormous Stability to Soybean Agglutinin: A Comparison of the Stability of Monomer and Tetramer of Soybean Agglutinin
Biophys. J., June 1, 2005; 88(6): 4243 - 4251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Biophysical Society.