This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: biophysj.104.050112v1 88/5/3360    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hildenbrand, M. F. Articles by Bayerl, T. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hildenbrand, M. F. Articles by Bayerl, T. M.

Differences in the Modulation of Collective Membrane Motions by Ergosterol, Lanosterol, and Cholesterol: A Dynamic Light Scattering Study

Universität Würzburg, Physikalisches Institut EP-5, Würzburg, Germany

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Prof. Thomas M. Bayerl, Universität Würzburg, Physikalisches Institut EP-5, Am Hubland, D-97074 Würzburg, Germany. Tel.: 49-931-888-5863; Fax: 49-931-888-5851; E-mail: bayerl{at}physik.uni-wuerzburg.de.

A dynamic light scattering setup was used to study the undulations of freely suspended planar lipid bilayers, the so-called black lipid membranes, over a previously inaccessible range of frequency and wave number. A pure synthetic lecithin bilayer, 1,2-dielaidoyl-sn-3-glycero-phoshatidylcholine (DEPC), and binary mixtures of DEPC with 40 mol % of cholesterol, ergosterol, or lanosterol were studied. By analyzing the dynamic light scattering data (oscillation and damping curves) in terms of transverse shear motion, we extracted the lateral tension and surface viscosity of the composite bilayers for each sterol. Cholesterol gave the strongest increase in lateral tension (approximately sixfold) with respect to the DEPC control, followed by lanosterol (approximately twofold), and ergosterol (1.7-fold). Most interestingly, only cholesterol simultaneously altered the surface viscosity of the bilayer by almost two orders of magnitude, whereas the other two sterols did not affect this parameter. We interpret this unique behavior of cholesterol as a result of its previously established out-of-plane motion which allows the molecule to cross the bilayer midplane, thereby effectively coupling the bilayer leaflets to form a highly flexible but more stable composite membrane.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Hodzic, M. Rappolt, H. Amenitsch, P. Laggner, and G. Pabst Differential Modulation of Membrane Structure and Fluctuations by Plant Sterols and Cholesterol Biophys. J., May 15, 2008; 94(10): 3935 - 3944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. G. Putzel and M. Schick Phase Behavior of a Model Bilayer Membrane with Coupled Leaves Biophys. J., February 1, 2008; 94(3): 869 - 877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Mannock, R. N. A. H. Lewis, and R. N. McElhaney Comparative Calorimetric and Spectroscopic Studies of the Effects of Lanosterol and Cholesterol on the Thermotropic Phase Behavior and Organization of Dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine Bilayer Membranes Biophys. J., November 1, 2006; 91(9): 3327 - 3340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. W. Allender and M. Schick Phase Separation in Bilayer Lipid Membranes: Effects on the Inner Leaf Due to Coupling to the Outer Leaf Biophys. J., October 15, 2006; 91(8): 2928 - 2935. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Shahedi, G. Oradd, and G. Lindblom Domain-Formation in DOPC/SM Bilayers Studied by pfg-NMR: Effect of Sterol Structure Biophys. J., October 1, 2006; 91(7): 2501 - 2507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W.-C. Lin, C. D. Blanchette, T. V. Ratto, and M. L. Longo Lipid Asymmetry in DLPC/DSPC-Supported Lipid Bilayers: A Combined AFM and Fluorescence Microscopy Study Biophys. J., January 1, 2006; 90(1): 228 - 237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]