help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Originally published as Biophys J. BioFAST on March 18, 2005.
doi:10.1529/biophysj.104.057323
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.104.057323v1
88/6/4118    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zinchenko, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Yoshikawa, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zinchenko, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Yoshikawa, K.
Biophysical Journal 88:4118-4123 (2005)
© 2005 The Biophysical Society

Na+ Shows a Markedly Higher Potential than K+ in DNA Compaction in a Crowded Environment

Anatoly A. Zinchenko and Kenichi Yoshikawa

Department of Physics, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto, Japan

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Anatoly A. Zinchenko, E-mail: zinchenko{at}chem.scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp.

Whereas many physicochemical investigations have shown that among monovalent cations Na+ ion possesses minimal potential for DNA binding, biological assays have shown that Na+ ion (in contrast to K+ ion) plays a primary role in chromatin compaction and related processes. It is difficult to explain this inverse relationship between the compaction potentials of Na+ and K+ and their binding abilities. In this study we sought to resolve this contradiction and emphasize the phenomenological distinction between DNA compaction and DNA binding processes in the case of DNA compaction by monocations. Using polyethylene glycol solutions as a model of a crowded cell environment, we studied DNA compaction by alkali metal salts LiCl, NaCl, KCl, RbCl, and CsCl, and found that all of these monocations promote DNA compaction. Among these monovalent cations Na+ produces the greatest compaction and the ratio of K+ cand Na+ oncentrations for DNA compaction is ~1.5–2. A comparative analysis of recent experimental results indicates that a higher binding activity of monocation generally corresponds to a low compaction potential of the corresponding monovalent ion. This inverse relation is explained as a result of partial dehydration of monocations in the compact state.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
Y. Cheng, N. Korolev, and L. Nordenskiold
Similarities and differences in interaction of K+ and Na+ with condensed ordered DNA. A molecular dynamics computer simulation study
Nucleic Acids Res., January 30, 2006; 34(2): 686 - 696.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Biophysical Society.