This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: biophysj.105.062380v1 89/2/1102    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Vidal, A. Articles by McIntosh, T. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Vidal, A. Articles by McIntosh, T. J.

Transbilayer Peptide Sorting between Raft and Nonraft Bilayers: Comparisons of Detergent Extraction and Confocal Microscopy

Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Thomas J. McIntosh, E-mail: t.mcintosh{at}cellbio.duke.edu.

Membrane microdomains ("rafts") that sequester specific proteins and lipids are often characterized by their resistance to detergent extraction. Because rafts are enriched in sphingomyelin and cholesterol, raft bilayers are thicker and have larger area compressibility moduli than nonraft bilayers. It has been postulated that rafts concentrate proteins with long transmembrane domains (TMDs) because of "hydrophobic matching" between the TMDs and the thick raft bilayers. However, previous detergent extraction experiments with bilayers containing raft and nonraft domains have shown that the peptides P-23 and P-29, designed to have single TMDs matching the hydrocarbon thicknesses of detergent soluble membranes and detergent resistant membranes, respectively, are both localized to detergent soluble membranes. Those results imply that both peptides are preferentially located in nonraft domains. However, because the detergent solubilizes part of the bilayer, it has been unclear whether or not detergent extraction experiments provide an accurate indication of the location of peptides in intact bilayers. Here we use confocal microscopy to examine the distribution of these same peptides in intact bilayers containing both raft and nonraft domains. At 20°C and 37°C, P-23 and P-29 were both primarily localized in fluorescently labeled nonraft domains. These confocal results validate the previous detergent extraction experiments and demonstrate the importance of bilayer cohesive properties, compared to hydrophobic mismatch, in the sorting of these peptides that contain a single TMD.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. Rawicz, B. A. Smith, T. J. McIntosh, S. A. Simon, and E. Evans Elasticity, Strength, and Water Permeability of Bilayers that Contain Raft Microdomain-Forming Lipids Biophys. J., June 15, 2008; 94(12): 4725 - 4736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Tong, L. Nguyen, A. Vidal, S. A. Simon, J. H. P. Skene, and T. J. McIntosh Role of GAP-43 in Sequestering Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-Bisphosphate to Raft Bilayers Biophys. J., January 1, 2008; 94(1): 125 - 133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Pokorny, L. E. Yandek, A. I. Elegbede, A. Hinderliter, and P. F. F. Almeida Temperature and Composition Dependence of the Interaction of {delta}-Lysin with Ternary Mixtures of Sphingomyelin/Cholesterol/POPC Biophys. J., September 15, 2006; 91(6): 2184 - 2197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]