This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: biophysj.105.060681v1 89/2/1165    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lindemann, C. B. Articles by Lesich, K. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lindemann, C. B. Articles by Lesich, K. A.

The Counterbend Phenomenon in Dynein-Disabled Rat Sperm Flagella and What It Reveals about the Interdoublet Elasticity

Department of Biological Sciences, Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan 48309-4476

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Charles B. Lindemann, Tel.: 248-370-3576; Fax: 248-370-4225; E-mail: lindeman{at}oakland.edu.

Rat sperm that have been rendered passive by disabling the dynein motors with 50 µM sodium metavanadate and 0.1 mM ATP exhibit an interesting response to imposed bending. When the proximal flagellum is bent with a microprobe, the portion of the flagellum distal to the probe contact point develops a bend in the direction opposite the imposed bend. This "counterbend" is not compatible with a simple elastic beam. It can be satisfactorily explained by the sliding tubule model of flagellar structure but only if there are permanent elastic connections between the outer doublets of the axoneme. The elastic component that contributes the bending torque for the counterbend does not reset to a new equilibrium position after an imposed bend but returns the flagellum to a nearly straight or slightly curved final position after release from the probe. This suggests it is based on fixed, rather than mobile, attachments. It is also disrupted by elastase or trypsin digestion, confirming that it is dependent on a protein linkage. Adopting the assumption that the elasticity is attributed to the nexin links that repeat at 96 nm intervals, we find an apparent elasticity for each link that ranges from 1.6 to 10 x 10^–5 N/m. However, the elasticity is nonlinear and does not follow Hooke's law but appears to decrease with increased stretch. In addition, the responsible elastic elements must be able to stretch to more than 10 times their resting length without breakage to account for the observed counterbend formation. Elasticity created by some type of protein unfolding may be the only viable explanation consistent with both the extreme capacity for extension and the nonlinear character of the restoring force that is observed.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Nicastro, C. Schwartz, J. Pierson, R. Gaudette, M. E. Porter, and J. R. McIntosh The molecular architecture of axonemes revealed by cryoelectron tomography. Science, August 18, 2006; 313(5789): 944 - 948. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]