help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Originally published as Biophys J. BioFAST on May 20, 2005.
doi:10.1529/biophysj.104.058768
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.104.058768v1
89/2/867    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kozakov, D.
Right arrow Articles by Camacho, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kozakov, D.
Right arrow Articles by Camacho, C. J.
Biophysical Journal 89:867-875 (2005)
© 2005 The Biophysical Society

Optimal Clustering for Detecting Near-Native Conformations in Protein Docking

Dima Kozakov *, Karl H. Clodfelter {dagger}, Sandor Vajda * {dagger} and Carlos J. Camacho * {dagger} {ddagger}

* Department of Biomedical Engineering and {dagger} Bioinformatics Graduate Program, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts; and {ddagger} Department of Computational Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to C. J. Camacho, E-mail: ccamacho{at}pitt.edu.

Clustering is one of the most powerful tools in computational biology. The conventional wisdom is that events that occur in clusters are probably not random. In protein docking, the underlying principle is that clustering occurs because long-range electrostatic and/or desolvation forces steer the proteins to a low free-energy attractor at the binding region. Something similar occurs in the docking of small molecules, although in this case shorter-range van der Waals forces play a more critical role. Based on the above, we have developed two different clustering strategies to predict docked conformations based on the clustering properties of a uniform sampling of low free-energy protein-protein and protein-small molecule complexes. We report on significant improvements in the automated prediction and discrimination of docked conformations by using the cluster size and consensus as a ranking criterion. We show that the success of clustering depends on identifying the appropriate clustering radius of the system. The clustering radius for protein-protein complexes is consistent with the range of the electrostatics and desolvation free energies (i.e., between 4 and 9 Å); for protein-small molecule docking, the radius is set by van der Waals interactions (i.e., at ~2 Å). Without any a priori information, a simple analysis of the histogram of distance separations between the set of docked conformations can evaluate the clustering properties of the data set. Clustering is observed when the histogram is bimodal. Data clustering is optimal if one chooses the clustering radius to be the minimum after the first peak of the bimodal distribution. We show that using this optimal radius further improves the discrimination of near-native complex structures.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
V. I. Lesk and M. J. E. Sternberg
3D-Garden: a system for modelling protein-protein complexes based on conformational refinement of ensembles generated with the marching cubes algorithm
Bioinformatics, May 1, 2008; 24(9): 1137 - 1144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Biophysical Society.