| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Departments of Bioengineering and Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Correspondence: Address reprint requests to David J. Graves, 311A Towne Bldg., 220 South 33 St., Philadelphia, PA 19104. Tel.: 215-898-7951; E-mail: graves{at}seas.upenn.edu.
Although the kinetics of hybridization between a soluble polynucleotide and an immobilized complementary sequence have been studied by others, it is almost universally assumed that the interaction between each probe/target pair can be treated as a separate event. This simplifies the mathematics considerably, but it can give a false picture of the extent of hybridization that one achieves at equilibrium as well as the relative quantities of each hybridized pair during the approach to equilibrium. Here we solve the relevant kinetics equations simultaneously using Mathematica as a simulation language. Among the interesting results of this study are that, for certain circumstances, the relative ratio of incorrect to correct hybrids can change dramatically with time; that the relative abundances of two pairs are not what one would expect based on their equilibrium dissociation constants; that the volume of a wash solution after hybridization can have a large effect on results; and the fact that a short wash is typically better than a long one. We show that an optimum wash time exists for a given set of conditions. In addition, the ratio of soluble to insoluble (spotted) molecules can influence results substantially. Finally, the true levels of rare transcripts can be masked by the presence of highly abundant ones. Code is supplied to enable others to study conditions beyond those presented in this article.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Koltai and C. Weingarten-Baror Specificity of DNA microarray hybridization: characterization, effectors and approaches for data correction Nucleic Acids Res., April 1, 2008; 36(7): 2395 - 2405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Bishop, A. M. Chagovetz, and S. Blair Kinetics of Multiplex Hybridization: Mechanisms and Implications Biophys. J., March 1, 2008; 94(5): 1726 - 1734. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Fish, M. T. Horne, R. P. Searles, G. P. Brewood, and A. S. Benight Multiplex SNP Discrimination Biophys. J., May 15, 2007; 92(10): L89 - L91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Bishop, C. Wilson, A. M. Chagovetz, and S. Blair Competitive Displacement of DNA during Surface Hybridization Biophys. J., January 1, 2007; 92(1): L10 - L12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Horne, D. J. Fish, and A. S. Benight Statistical Thermodynamics and Kinetics of DNA Multiplex Hybridization Reactions Biophys. J., December 1, 2006; 91(11): 4133 - 4153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Bishop, S. Blair, and A. M. Chagovetz A Competitive Kinetic Model of Nucleic Acid Surface Hybridization in the Presence of Point Mutants Biophys. J., February 1, 2006; 90(3): 831 - 840. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |