This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) supplemental All Versions of this Article: biophysj.105.063032v1 89/5/3183    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Haque, Md. E. Articles by Lentz, B. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Haque, Md. E. Articles by Lentz, B. R.

Properties and Structures of the Influenza and HIV Fusion Peptides on Lipid Membranes: Implications for a Role in Fusion

Md. Emdadul Haque ^*, Vishwanath Koppaka , Paul H. Axelsen  and Barry R. Lentz ^*

^* Department of Biochemistry and Program in Molecular/Cell Biophysics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7260; and Departments of Pharmacology and Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Barry R. Lentz, E-mail: uncbrl{at}med.unc.edu.

The fusion peptides of HIV and influenza virus are crucial for viral entry into a host cell. We report the membrane-perturbing and structural properties of fusion peptides from the HA fusion protein of influenza virus and the gp41 fusion protein of HIV. Our goals were to determine: 1), how fusion peptides alter structure within the bilayers of fusogenic and nonfusogenic lipid vesicles and 2), how fusion peptide structure is related to the ability to promote fusion. Fluorescent probes revealed that neither peptide had a significant effect on bilayer packing at the water-membrane interface, but both increased acyl chain order in both fusogenic and nonfusogenic vesicles. Both also reduced free volume within the bilayer as indicated by partitioning of a lipophilic fluorophore into membranes. These membrane ordering effects were smaller for the gp41 peptide than for the HA peptide at low peptide/lipid ratio, suggesting that the two peptides assume different structures on membranes. The influenza peptide was predominantly helical, and the gp41 peptide was predominantly antiparallel ß-sheet when membrane bound, however, the depths of penetration of Trps of both peptides into neutral membranes were similar and independent of membrane composition. We previously demonstrated: 1), the abilities of both peptides to promote fusion but not initial intermediate formation during PEG-mediated fusion and 2), the ability of hexadecane to compete with this effect of the fusion peptides. Taken together, our current and past results suggest a hypothesis for a common mechanism by which these two viral fusion peptides promote fusion.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M.-P. Chien, S. Jiang, and D.-K. Chang The function of coreceptor as a basis for the kinetic dissection of HIV type 1 envelope protein-mediated cell fusion FASEB J, April 1, 2008; 22(4): 1179 - 1192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Md. E. Haque, D. Grasso, and L. L. Spremulli The interaction of mammalian mitochondrial translational initiation factor 3 with ribosomes: evolution of terminal extensions in IF3mt Nucleic Acids Res., February 2, 2008; 36(2): 589 - 597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]