This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) supplemental All Versions of this Article: biophysj.105.064485v1 89/6/4159    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brinda, K. V. Articles by Vishveshwara, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Brinda, K. V. Articles by Vishveshwara, S.

A Network Representation of Protein Structures: Implications for Protein Stability

Molecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Saraswathi Vishveshwara, Molecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India. Tel.: 91-80-22932611; Fax: 91-80-23600535; E-mail: sv{at}mbu.iisc.ernet.in.

This study views each protein structure as a network of noncovalent connections between amino acid side chains. Each amino acid in a protein structure is a node, and the strength of the noncovalent interactions between two amino acids is evaluated for edge determination. The protein structure graphs (PSGs) for 232 proteins have been constructed as a function of the cutoff of the amino acid interaction strength at a few carefully chosen values. Analysis of such PSGs constructed on the basis of edge weights has shown the following: 1), The PSGs exhibit a complex topological network behavior, which is dependent on the interaction cutoff chosen for PSG construction. 2), A transition is observed at a critical interaction cutoff, in all the proteins, as monitored by the size of the largest cluster (giant component) in the graph. Amazingly, this transition occurs within a narrow range of interaction cutoff for all the proteins, irrespective of the size or the fold topology. And 3), the amino acid preferences to be highly connected (hub frequency) have been evaluated as a function of the interaction cutoff. We observe that the aromatic residues along with arginine, histidine, and methionine act as strong hubs at high interaction cutoffs, whereas the hydrophobic leucine and isoleucine residues get added to these hubs at low interaction cutoffs, forming weak hubs. The hubs identified are found to play a role in bringing together different secondary structural elements in the tertiary structure of the proteins. They are also found to contribute to the additional stability of the thermophilic proteins when compared to their mesophilic counterparts and hence could be crucial for the folding and stability of the unique three-dimensional structure of proteins. Based on these results, we also predict a few residues in the thermophilic and mesophilic proteins that can be mutated to alter their thermal stability.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Bagler and S. Sinha Assortative mixing in Protein Contact Networks and protein folding kinetics Bioinformatics, July 15, 2007; 23(14): 1760 - 1767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Md. Aftabuddin and S. Kundu Hydrophobic, Hydrophilic, and Charged Amino Acid Networks within Protein Biophys. J., July 1, 2007; 93(1): 225 - 231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Ghosh, K. V. Brinda, and S. Vishveshwara Dynamics of Lysozyme Structure Network: Probing the Process of Unfolding Biophys. J., April 1, 2007; 92(7): 2523 - 2535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]