Biophysical Journal 9: 1-21 (1969)
© 1969 the Biophysical Society

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Munday, J. C. Articles by Govindjee, Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Munday, J. C., Jr. Articles by Govindjee,

Light-Induced Changes in the Fluorescence Yield of Chlorophyll a In Vivo

III. The Dip and the Peak in the Fluorescence Transient of Chlorella pyrenoidosa

ABSTRACT

The fluorescence transient of Chlorella pyrenoidosa, excited by saturating light absorbed mainly by system II, has a dip D between the peak I at 75 msec and the large peak P at 400 msec (the times depend on light intensity). This dip is observed in aerobic cells and in anaerobic cells where it is prominent. In anaerobic cells, the I-D decline is hastened almost equally by absorption of either 705 or 650 nm background light. In anaerobic cells, supplementary 700 and 710 nm light given during the transient slightly hastens and heightens P. Methyl viologen, an exogenous system I electron acceptor, eliminates P. Results suggest that system I action causes D, and that P is due to reduction of Q (fluorescence quencher) and intersystem intermediates caused by development of a block in oxidation of XH (X being the primary electron acceptor of light reaction I). Mathematical analysis suggests that if only two forms of Q participate beyond I, then system I action is required for D. If three forms participate, then the system Q QH Q' (see text) may explain D. The Malkin model (14), in its present form, does not allow D.