This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplement All Versions of this Article: biophysj.105.074898v1 90/10/3375    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Coluzza, I. Articles by Frenkel, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Coluzza, I. Articles by Frenkel, D.

Translocation Boost Protein-Folding Efficiency of Double-Barreled Chaperonins

Ivan Coluzza ^*, Saskia M. van der Vies  and Daan Frenkel 

^* Cambridge University Centre for Computational Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and Computational Physics, FOM Institute for Atomic and Molecular Physics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Ivan Coluzza, Cambridge University Centre for Computational Chemistry, Dept. of Chemistry, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK. Tel.: 44-1223-336377; Fax: 44-1223-336362; E-mail: ic247{at}cam.ac.uk.

Incorrect folding of proteins in living cells may lead to malfunctioning of the cell machinery. To prevent such cellular disasters from happening, all cells contain molecular chaperones that assist nonnative proteins in folding into the correct native structure. One of the most studied chaperone complexes is the GroEL-GroES complex. The GroEL part has a "double-barrel" structure, which consists of two cylindrical chambers joined at the bottom in a symmetrical fashion. The hydrophobic rim of one of the GroEL chambers captures nonnative proteins. The GroES part acts as a lid that temporarily closes the filled chamber during the folding process. Several capture-folding-release cycles are required before the nonnative protein reaches its native state. Here we report molecular simulations that suggest that translocation of the nonnative protein through the equatorial plane of the complex boosts the efficiency of the chaperonin action. If the target protein is correctly folded after translocation, it is released. However, if it is still nonnative, it is likely to remain trapped in the second chamber, which then closes to start a reverse translocation process. This shuttling back and forth continues until the protein is correctly folded. Our model provides a natural explanation for the prevalence of double-barreled chaperonins. Moreover, we argue that internal folding is both more efficient and safer than a scenario where partially refolded proteins escape from the complex before being recaptured.