help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Originally published as Biophys J. BioFAST on March 24, 2006.
doi:10.1529/biophysj.105.066654
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.105.066654v1
90/12/4558    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Damm, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Carlson, H. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Damm, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Carlson, H. A.
Biophysical Journal 90:4558-4573 (2006)
© 2006 The Biophysical Society

Gaussian-Weighted RMSD Superposition of Proteins: A Structural Comparison for Flexible Proteins and Predicted Protein Structures

Kelly L. Damm and Heather A. Carlson

Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1065

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Heather A. Carlson, Tel.: 734-615-6841; Fax: 734-763-2022; E-mail: carlsonh{at}umich.edu.

Many proteins contain flexible structures such as loops and hinged domains. A simple root mean square deviation (RMSD) alignment of two different conformations of the same protein can be skewed by the difference between the mobile regions. To overcome this problem, we have developed a novel method to overlay two protein conformations by their atomic coordinates using a Gaussian-weighted RMSD (wRMSD) fit. The algorithm is based on the Kabsch least-squares method and determines an optimal transformation between two molecules by calculating the minimal weighted deviation between the two coordinate sets. Unlike other techniques that choose subsets of residues to overlay, all atoms are included in the wRMSD overlay. Atoms that barely move between the two conformations will have a greater weighting than those that have a large displacement. Our superposition tool has produced successful alignments when applied to proteins for which two conformations are known. The transformation calculation is heavily weighted by the coordinates of the static region of the two conformations, highlighting the range of flexibility in the overlaid structures. Lastly, we show how wRMSD fits can be used to evaluate predicted protein structures. Comparing a predicted fold to its experimentally determined target structure is another case of comparing two protein conformations of the same sequence, and the degree of alignment directly reflects the quality of the prediction.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Biophysical Society.