| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||



* Center for Biophysics and Computational Biology, and
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois; and Departments of
Pathology and
Physics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver,British Columbia, Canada
Correspondence: Address reprint requests to D. E. Leckband, Tel.: 217-244-0793; E-mail: leckband{at}uiuc.edu.
Cadherins are multidomain adhesion proteins whose interactions direct cell sorting during histogenesis. They determine cell adhesion specificity, but prior studies failed to identify physical differences that could underlie cell sorting. These single molecule studies identify kinetic and strength differences between different cadherins. They further demonstrate that the modular extracellular architecture of cleavage stage C-cadherin supports a multistate binding mechanism. These multiple bonds exhibit a kinetic hierarchy of strengths that map to the different cadherin domains. The outer two N-terminal domains of C-cadherin form two bound states with dissociation rates of 3.9 and 0.02 s1. The latter is 25-fold slower than between the corresponding epithelial cadherin segments. In addition to the two fast bonds, the five-domain fragment (CEC1-5) forms two additional stronger, longer-lived bonds with dissociation rates of 0.00039 and 0.00001 s1. We further quantified the lifetimes of bonds subject to a constant force, and thus identified multiple dissociation events with rates that agree quantitatively with the force spectroscopy data. The qualitative features are similar to those reported for epithelial cadherin. However, the significant differences in the dissociation rates of the outer domains, which include the specificity-determining region, suggest that kinetic differences may determine cadherin discrimination, rather than adhesion energies.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Sotomayor and K. Schulten The Allosteric Role of the Ca2+ Switch in Adhesion and Elasticity of C-Cadherin Biophys. J., June 15, 2008; 94(12): 4621 - 4633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Pittet, K. Lee, A. J. Kulik, J.-J. Meister, and B. Hinz Fibrogenic fibroblasts increase intercellular adhesion strength by reinforcing individual OB-cadherin bonds J. Cell Sci., March 15, 2008; 121(6): 877 - 886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-H. Chien, N. Jiang, F. Li, F. Zhang, C. Zhu, and D. Leckband Two Stage Cadherin Kinetics Require Multiple Extracellular Domains but Not the Cytoplasmic Region J. Biol. Chem., January 25, 2008; 283(4): 1848 - 1856. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. F. Liu, C. M. Nelson, J. L. Tan, and C. S. Chen Cadherins, RhoA, and Rac1 Are Differentially Required for Stretch-Mediated Proliferation in Endothelial Versus Smooth Muscle Cells Circ. Res., August 31, 2007; 101(5): e44 - e52. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Karymov, A. V. Krasnoslobodtsev, and Y. L. Lyubchenko Dynamics of Synaptic SfiI-DNA Complex: Single-Molecule Fluorescence Analysis Biophys. J., May 1, 2007; 92(9): 3241 - 3250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Cailliez and R. Lavery Dynamics and Stability of E-Cadherin Dimers Biophys. J., December 1, 2006; 91(11): 3964 - 3971. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |