This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: biophysj.105.066084v1 90/6/2179    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Palo, K. Articles by Kask, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Palo, K. Articles by Kask, P.

Calculation of Photon-Count Number Distributions via Master Equations

Evotec Technologies, Harku, Estonia

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Dr. Peet Kask, Evotec Technologies GmbH, Instituudi tee 11, 76902 Harku, Estonia. Tel.: 37-2-651-1146; Fax: 372-651-1146; E-mail: peet.kask{at}evotec-technologies.com.

Fitting of photon-count number histograms is a way of analysis of fluorescence intensity fluctuations, a successor to fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. First versions of the theory for calculating photon-count number distributions have assumed constant emission intensity by a molecule during a counting time interval. For a long time a question has remained unanswered: to what extent is this assumption violated in experiments? Here we present a theory of photon-count number distributions that takes account of intensity fluctuations during a counting time interval. Theoretical count-number distributions are calculated via a numerical solution of Master equations (ME), which is a set of differential equations describing diffusion, singlet-triplet transitions, and photon emission. Detector afterpulsing and dead-time corrections are also included. The ME-theory is tested by fitting a series of photon-count number histograms corresponding to different lengths of the counting time interval. Compared to the first version of fluorescence intensity multiple distribution analysis theory introduced in 2000, the fit quality is significantly improved. It is discussed how a theory of photon-count number distributions, which assumes constant emission intensity during a counting time interval, may also yield a good fit quality. We argue that the spatial brightness distribution used in calculations of the fit curve is not the true spatial brightness distribution. Instead, a number of dynamic processes, which cause fluorescence intensity fluctuations, are indirectly taken into account via the profile adjustment parameters.