help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Originally published as Biophys J. BioFAST on September 8, 2006.
doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.088518
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.106.088518v1
91/11/4154    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gemmen, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gemmen, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, D. E.
Biophysical Journal 91:4154-4165 (2006)
© 2006 The Biophysical Society

Dynamics of Single DNA Looping and Cleavage by Sau3AI and Effect of Tension Applied to the DNA

Gregory J. Gemmen, Rachel Millin and Douglas E. Smith

Department of Physics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Douglas E. Smith, E-mail: des{at}physics.ucsd.edu.

Looping and cleavage of single DNA molecules by the two-site restriction endonuclease Sau3AI were measured with optical tweezers. A DNA template containing many recognition sites was used, permitting loop sizes from ~10 to 10,000 basepairs. At high enzyme concentration, cleavage events were detected within 5 s and nearly all molecules were cleaved within 5 min. Activity decreased ~10-fold as the DNA tension was increased from 0.03 to 0.7 pN. Substituting Ca2+ for Mg2+ blocked cleavage, permitting measurement of stable loops. At low tension, the initial rates of cleavage and looping were similar (~0.025 s–1 at 0.1 pN), suggesting that looping is rate limiting. Short loops formed more rapidly than long loops. The optimum size decreased from ~250 to 45 basepairs and the average number of loops (in 1 min) from 4.2 to 0.75 as tension was increased from 0.03 to 0.7 pN. No looping was detected at 5 pN. These findings are in qualitative agreement with recent theoretical predictions considering only DNA mechanics, but we observed weaker suppression with tension and smaller loop sizes. Our results suggest that the span and elasticity of the protein complex, nesting of loops, and protein-induced DNA bending and wrapping play an important role.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
L. E. Catto, S. R. W. Bellamy, S. E. Retter, and S. E. Halford
Dynamics and consequences of DNA looping by the FokI restriction endonuclease
Nucleic Acids Res., April 1, 2008; 36(6): 2073 - 2081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
S. Goyal, T. Lillian, S. Blumberg, J.-C. Meiners, E. Meyhofer, and N. C. Perkins
Intrinsic Curvature of DNA Influences LacR-Mediated Looping
Biophys. J., December 15, 2007; 93(12): 4342 - 4359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Biophysical Society.