help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kantarci, N.
Right arrow Articles by Haliloglu, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kantarci, N.
Right arrow Articles by Haliloglu, T.
Biophysical Journal 91:421-432 (2006)
© 2006 The Biophysical Society

Cooperative Fluctuations Point to the Dimerization Interface of P53 Core Domain

Nigar Kantarci, Pemra Doruker and Turkan Haliloglu

Department of Chemical Engineering and Polymer Research Center, Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Turkan Haliloglu, Tel.: 90-212-359-7002; Fax: 90-212-257-5032; E-mail: halilogt{at}boun.edu.tr.

Elastic network models are used for investigation of the p53 core domain functional dynamics. Global modes of motion indicate high positive correlations for residue fluctuations across the A-B interface, which are not observed at the B-C interface. Major hinge formation is observed at the A-B interface upon dimerization indicating stability of the A-B dimer. These findings imply A-B as the native dimerization interface, whereas B-C is the crystal interface. The A-B dimer exhibits an opening-closing motion about DNA, supporting the previously suggested clamp-like model of nonspecific DNA binding followed by diffusion. Monomer A has limited positive correlations with DNA, while monomer B exhibits high positive correlations with DNA in the functionally significant slow modes. Thus, monomer B might seem to maintain the stability of the dimer-DNA complex by forming the relatively fixed arm of the dimer clamp, whereas the other arm of the clamp, monomer A, might allow sliding via continuous association/dissociation mechanisms.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
B. Ma and A. J. Levine
Probing potential binding modes of the p53 tetramer to DNA based on the symmetries encoded in p53 response elements
Nucleic Acids Res., December 3, 2007; 35(22): 7733 - 7747.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Biophysical Society.