help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Originally published as Biophys J. BioFAST on April 28, 2006.
doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.082313
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.106.082313v1
91/2/508    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Forrest, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by Honig, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Forrest, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by Honig, B.
Biophysical Journal 91:508-517 (2006)
© 2006 The Biophysical Society

On the Accuracy of Homology Modeling and Sequence Alignment Methods Applied to Membrane Proteins

Lucy R. Forrest, Christopher L. Tang and Barry Honig

Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Barry Honig, E-mail: bh6{at}columbia.edu.

In this study, we investigate the extent to which techniques for homology modeling that were developed for water-soluble proteins are appropriate for membrane proteins as well. To this end we present an assessment of current strategies for homology modeling of membrane proteins and introduce a benchmark data set of homologous membrane protein structures, called HOMEP. First, we use HOMEP to reveal the relationship between sequence identity and structural similarity in membrane proteins. This analysis indicates that homology modeling is at least as applicable to membrane proteins as it is to water-soluble proteins and that acceptable models (with C{alpha}-RMSD values to the native of 2 Å or less in the transmembrane regions) may be obtained for template sequence identities of 30% or higher if an accurate alignment of the sequences is used. Second, we show that secondary-structure prediction algorithms that were developed for water-soluble proteins perform approximately as well for membrane proteins. Third, we provide a comparison of a set of commonly used sequence alignment algorithms as applied to membrane proteins. We find that high-accuracy alignments of membrane protein sequences can be obtained using state-of-the-art profile-to-profile methods that were developed for water-soluble proteins. Improvements are observed when weights derived from the secondary structure of the query and the template are used in the scoring of the alignment, a result which relies on the accuracy of the secondary-structure prediction of the query sequence. The most accurate alignments were obtained using template profiles constructed with the aid of structural alignments. In contrast, a simple sequence-to-sequence alignment algorithm, using a membrane protein-specific substitution matrix, shows no improvement in alignment accuracy. We suggest that profile-to-profile alignment methods should be adopted to maximize the accuracy of homology models of membrane proteins.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
W. Pirovano, K. A. Feenstra, and J. Heringa
PRALINETM: a strategy for improved multiple alignment of transmembrane proteins
Bioinformatics, February 15, 2008; 24(4): 492 - 497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Landau, K. Herz, E. Padan, and N. Ben-Tal
Model Structure of the Na+/H+ Exchanger 1 (NHE1): FUNCTIONAL AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
J. Biol. Chem., December 28, 2007; 282(52): 37854 - 37863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
J. Holyoake, V. Caulfeild, S. A. Baldwin, and M. S. P. Sansom
Modeling, Docking, and Simulation of the Major Facilitator Superfamily
Biophys. J., November 15, 2006; 91(10): L84 - L86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Biophysical Society.